GSM, I think he needs to take the WC and get those 250 points (plus more match play). If he's losing early in the bigger events he's not going to amass enough points to hold on to that spot.
the AntiPusher said:NADAL2005RG said:Federer/Monfils are both great talents, but despite being horrendously injured Monfils showed more grit which got him over the line. Once again Federer falls one round short of facing a top tier player.
Did you watch the match? If so , have you ever seen such horrendous calls on service lines. When Fed was serving at 1-4 15-40, Fed serve was about 8 inch out, he almost stop play and Monfils slowed up also but was thinking that the idiot umpire was going to over rule but that clown never did.
Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:NADAL2005RG said:Federer/Monfils are both great talents, but despite being horrendously injured Monfils showed more grit which got him over the line. Once again Federer falls one round short of facing a top tier player.
Did you watch the match? If so , have you ever seen such horrendous calls on service lines. When Fed was serving at 1-4 15-40, Fed serve was about 8 inch out, he almost stop play and Monfils slowed up also but was thinking that the idiot umpire was going to over rule but that clown never did.
Horrendously injured eh? :nono
Sundaymorningguy said:Well Murray pulled out so Fed can breathe easy for now that he will make London.
the AntiPusher said:Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:NADAL2005RG said:Federer/Monfils are both great talents, but despite being horrendously injured Monfils showed more grit which got him over the line. Once again Federer falls one round short of facing a top tier player.
Did you watch the match? If so , have you ever seen such horrendous calls on service lines. When Fed was serving at 1-4 15-40, Fed serve was about 8 inch out, he almost stop play and Monfils slowed up also but was thinking that the idiot umpire was going to over rule but that clown never did.
Horrendously injured eh? :nono
Monfils did treak his in shoe instep..
GameSetAndMath said:Sundaymorningguy said:Well Murray pulled out so Fed can breathe easy for now that he will make London.
Which bubble are you in? Even with Murray pulling out, it is not clear
whether Fed will make it at this rate. He is already at #8 in ATP race
and Gasquet and Milos are threatening to surpass him in the race.
Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:NADAL2005RG said:Federer/Monfils are both great talents, but despite being horrendously injured Monfils showed more grit which got him over the line. Once again Federer falls one round short of facing a top tier player.
Did you watch the match? If so , have you ever seen such horrendous calls on service lines. When Fed was serving at 1-4 15-40, Fed serve was about 8 inch out, he almost stop play and Monfils slowed up also but was thinking that the idiot umpire was going to over rule but that clown never did.
Horrendously injured eh? :nono
Monfils did treak his in shoe instep..
Yeah but horrendously injured is as laughable as some of his other claims. If he was horrendously injured he'd either have (a) retired from the match or (b) lost despite how poorly Fed was playing so clearly he was not "horrendously injured".
kskate2 said:My personal favorite in all of this nonsense:
Before a ball was struck, Nadal's expression confirmed my pre-match ideas. It was a smartly played match (the shortest match of their rivalry perhaps) and Nadal now has an excellent opportunity to win Shanghai. No unnecessary fatigue. The perfect week. A perfect week that ends in a finals loss, hmm. :cover
Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:Front242 said:the AntiPusher said:NADAL2005RG said:Federer/Monfils are both great talents, but despite being horrendously injured Monfils showed more grit which got him over the line. Once again Federer falls one round short of facing a top tier player.
Did you watch the match? If so , have you ever seen such horrendous calls on service lines. When Fed was serving at 1-4 15-40, Fed serve was about 8 inch out, he almost stop play and Monfils slowed up also but was thinking that the idiot umpire was going to over rule but that clown never did.
Horrendously injured eh? :nono
Monfils did treak his in shoe instep..
Yeah but horrendously injured is as laughable as some of his other claims. If he was horrendously injured he'd either have (a) retired from the match or (b) lost despite how poorly Fed was playing so clearly he was not "horrendously injured".
tossip said:Monfils is a such free spirit...he does what he wants on court.He is a millionaire who plays when he wants and how he wants to.He dresses the way he wants to dress,has hairstyles that he wants...doesnt conform...stll making very good money.
DarthFed said:NADAL2005RG said:But its refreshing to see Federer fight for sets (not just matches....sets) on such a regular basis. I prefer this type of Federer over all other versions of him. Hopefully we get to see a few more years of it.
Yes, it is refreshing for you to see Roger become a scrub. I will enjoy it when it happens to your beloved Whafa too, and it will happen. No one beats Father Time.
Iona16 said:"I'm very happy to be part of this era in tennis. If I played in another era maybe I would have won more, but I wouldn’t have been as good a tennis player." Andy Murray
NADAL2005RG said:I take pleasure in seeing any athlete being pushed to their limits. That's what sport is all about to me. Not just sport, but life. I value hard work. That's why now that Federer's talent is not good enough and we are seeing him work hard for everything, its a lot more fun. This is why I was never a Federer fan before. His game was boring because he wasn't being physically exerted as much as the other elite players. Plus his techniques are boringly textbook, but that's a separate issue. Likewise, I will enjoy the 2nd half of Nadal's career even more than the 1st half when he has father time. I've always wanted to see more 5-setters at Roland Garros, but unfortunately Nadal has only played 2 of them. Hopefully we'll get some more epics like this year's RG semi (although obviously Nadal will be a bit sharper next year, so its unlikely).
NADAL2005RG said:Likewise, I will enjoy the 2nd half of Nadal's career even more than the 1st half when he has father time. I've always wanted to see more 5-setters at Roland Garros, but unfortunately Nadal has only played 2 of them. Hopefully we'll get some more epics like this year's RG semi (although obviously Nadal will be a bit sharper next year, so its unlikely).
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rolex Shanghai Masters, China - ATP Masters 1000, 2023 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 152 | ||
Shanghai Rolex Masters 2019, ATP Masters 1000 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 274 | ||
Rolex Shanghai Masters 2018, China | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 341 | ||
Shanghai Rolex Masters 2017, ATP Masters 1000 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 382 | ||
Shanghai Rolex Masters, ATP Masters 1000 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 176 |