monfed
Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2018
- Messages
- 2,112
- Reactions
- 506
- Points
- 113
I'd tell you how tennis can be saved and then people like you could disappear........soon
Cya in Mickey Carlo, Mamacita
I'd tell you how tennis can be saved and then people like you could disappear........soon
Don't agree. You really would put serious money on Denis?I say Rafa's running from an inevitable loss to Shapo on the fast, indoor courts of Paris! People were so sure he'd win, the jinx was on! :whistle:
Don't agree. You really would put serious money on Denis?
Haha, either you are brave or suicidal!In more ways than one! :heart: :whistle: - Then there's the possibility of trying to avoid Nole as well! Nadal's gutless at times!
Even if Novak wins his 34th Masters 1000 tomorrow, it wouldn’t be the same.
Hope Bull can play WTF healthy and in form!
I am totally on your side, but a win against Bull in a final is always special. Above all, to improve the h2h even further!!!!!!!!!I'll take them anyway they can be got! Fedal have had enough gift titles; why shouldn't Nole reap some benefit being the top player every once in a while? Nadal needs to go to the YEC if he has any hope or want to finishing the season #1! He'll say it's not important since he's nowhere near taking over that record! :whistle:
I am totally on your side, but a win against Bull in a final is always special. Above all, to improve the h2h even further!!!!!!!!!
The only fact is Rafa has 19 Grand Slam titles . Cali/Nalbandian ZeroAmazing how Nadal's injuries always come during the indoor season and hardly ever during the clay season. These pullouts never seem to happen at Monte Carlo or Madrid or Rome.
I understand why you say that Rafa was rather more exciting ('08-'13,) I think you expose your prejudice in the part I bolded above. Roger always so "fleet of foot," and Rafa "chugging along," and "workman-like." But you're not giving credit to the changes that Rafa has made to his game, esp. in terms of serve, and shortening points. There are still lots of jaw-droppers from Rafa, but he seems to have eschewed that for the sake of shortening points, etc. Is he less-good? He just became the player to win the most Majors post-30. Is his game really "less good," or is that it's not as dynamic as in his early years? If it's more effective, for his later-years, is it less-good? Especially if the results are there?
Oh please, stfu. LOL. Nadal should have lost on dozens of occasions to Federer and Djokovic that he didn't.
I don’t think Nadal relishes playing Djokovic outside of clay. He knows that once Djokovic neutralize his average serve, there is nowhere to go for him.I am totally on your side, but a win against Bull in a final is always special. Above all, to improve the h2h even further!!!!!!!!!
I don’t think Nadal relishes playing Djokovic outside of clay. He knows that once Djokovic neutralize his average serve, there is nowhere to go for him.
Absolutely. If Novak shows up with QF level he would have won, todays level would not be enough. I think it would have been a real battle!I don’t think Nadal relishes playing Djokovic outside of clay. He knows that once Djokovic neutralize his average serve, there is nowhere to go for him.
I would be the happiest to see Novak again in 2016 Quatar shape, he is far from that.IMO it might end up being a repeat of '19 AO getting wiped out; close to '16 Qatar Final annihilation! Lendl & Nole love indoor HC's! :whistle:
I agree with you. I don’t think he pulled out because he was afraid of playing Djokovic in the final. Mine was a general statement.Absolutely. If Novak shows up with QF level he would have won, todays level would not be enough. I think it would have been a real battle!
What i do not agree with, is that some here suggest that Bull avoids playing Novak, that sounds like fake injury. No way, you can say what you want about Nadal, i dislike him very much, but he is no coward, at least for that matter.