I was trying to address this on another thread the other day, and it was completely misunderstood, willfully, by another poster. Federer fans, and now Novak fans, keep talking about how Rafa's lack of weeks at #1 are a failing, because weeks at #1 are a measure of "consistency." But who was consistently in the top 10? As you say, who had to battle both on each side of his career? I will say again, because it's worth saying: who ever had to win 5 Majors before getting to #1? That was absolutely Roger having a laugh, because he was at his peak, and Rafa was still developing, and 5 years younger. In any other era, Rafa would have had plenty of time at #1 with his accomplishments, while instead he sat at #2, but consistently. Fed fans have sneered at Rafa's record weeks at #2, but that does speak to a consistency, since he was but a teenager, and about 22.2 when he got to #1. Roger was 22.6 when he reached #1 in Feb. 2004. With barely anyone to challenge him. And 2 Majors to his credit. Novak finally reached #1 in 2011, at 24.2, also with 2 Majors in the bank. For all of that, Rafa is still on the short list of all-time weeks at #1. You can only split those weeks so many ways, and I find it a bit rich that the Federer and Djokovic fans are so arrogant about it, given that Roger had such free-reign on the one side, and Novak had quite a lot on the other.