I don't think he made a lot of bone-headed decisions. What would you say he did that he should have done differently?In matches like these, where there's not much between them you have to take every advantage given. He didn't because he makes some boneheaded decisions
The tweener was Sock's and Lopez still won the point. And a DF isn't the kiss of death if you get past it. Feli did, and he won the match. Go back if you like, but it was a fairly even match.I'd have to go back and watch it, but there was a between the legs shot in the first set and then at least one DF in the TB. DF in TB is a nono
I get your pint, but you exagerate obviously comparing the field left with Challenger level.Whatever you think of that match, the stronger opponent, at least on paper (Sock #10), lost. Another top 10 out. That leaves only 3 top-20 players (Fed, Anderson & Delpo) among last 16 draw. Sam is #21 but the rest are in the #30-40 and some even around #100 mark. If not for Fed, that draw would resemble more of a challenger tour rather than the best of M1000.
Have you seen any weaker draw at this level in recent years or is it unprecedented? At a minimum, it appears all top players (not just Big 4) do experience some serious dip, except Fed of course.
First into the QF is Chung. Defeats Cuevas in straight sets
Absolutely. He is one of the best Next. Generation players .So far he hasn't disappointed; winning Next Gen Masters/YEC, upsets Novak, etc.! He's making a name for himself!
Absolutely. He is one of the best Next. Generation players .
Chung is really good but there are better next gen stars,Absolutely. He is one of the best Next. Generation players .