teddytennisfan
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2015
- Messages
- 3,166
- Reactions
- 498
- Points
- 113
Nobody is trying to silence you, per se. Just hitting the "mute" and "edit" buttons. You're not the only one who's paying attention to the world. But banging other people over the head, shouting with capital letters and having diarrhea of the keyboard doesn't really help your cause. You have other issues. May I suggest that you start a thread of your own?
NOW -- THAT'S REALLY RICH OF YOU..
you simply reveal one thng SO COMMON among americans -- citizens of the empire of chaos:
that when a subject is expanded, explored to its full extent -- they tehn resort , in their great, great discomfort at the EMBARRASSMENT of what they themselves KNOW to be true were they REALLY honest --
to nothing more than puerile personal attacks...such as :
==" oh something wrong about your CAPS...oh you are this and that, YOU .....you you you"
that is known as the attack on the messenger because they can't address the issues and where they LEAD.
ad hominem attacks...
roflmao...
you simplyc an't take the fact that insetead of your CAREFULLY arranged "'confines" and ''picture frame" of WHAT topics to address that are related to the subject YOU yourselves PRETEND to be concerned or know about
\'extrapolations" arrive that are TOO EMBARRASSING or discomfiting for your PREFERRED paradigms.
so then -- you PROFESS being ''rational" to say "can't you make your own threaD" ?
YOU CONCERN YOURSELVES WITH THE APPEARANCE OF SOMETHING OR SOMONE (CAPS, hey -- no yelling, hey -- your grammar, hey - your sytnax ,m, hey , ehey your daily ipills, hey )
as a way to DETRACT FROM THE ISSUE -- THAT FLOWS OUT OF THE SUBJECT YOU YOURSELVES thnk you are ''seriously discussing"
but ONLY to a certani LIMIT of ''truthiness"...
knowing that it IS a way for YOU TO AVOID what you OUGHT TO ADDRESS IN A TRUTHFUL , HONEST, MATURE WAY OF REASONING
no matter how it makes YOU unfcomrtable about YOUR assumptions!
ya ?
so -- tell me -- what ELSE did DONALD TRUMP SAY ABOUT NATO --
AND EXPLAIN WHY:
1) HE IS CORRECT ON ONE SIDE of his argumentation but
2) INACCURATE on the OTHER FLIP-SIDE OF THAT same argumentation
that -- on the surface at least -- he DIFFERS from KILLARLY KLLTON and HER FORMER ''boss"
emperor barry the nobel peace prize winner whose TANKS IN AFGHANISTAN
were ordered by HIS GOVERNMENT -- TO BARGE RIGHT THROUGH A HOSPITAL , AND LITERALLY BLOWIN GIT UP TO SMITHEREENS with paitents and doctors inside
? and it's HUSHED UP BY YOUR MORNING PAPERS?
YA?
what DO you know about the different between a TERRORIST BOMBING IN PAKISTAN'S city of lahore
that killed CHRISTIANS
FROM ONE that killed EUROPEAN christians in BRUSSELS?
OR -- DID YOU EVEN KNOW ABOUT WHY NO AMERICAN OR WESTERN LEADER SHED A TEAR
FOR THE brown skinned christians in lahore -- BUT HINDUS and MUSLIMS in INDIA did? EVEN IF PAKISTAN IS A BITTER RIVAL OF INDIA...
WHILE YOUR HYPOCRTICAL '\chirstian western civilziation" cries crocodile tears about
charlie hebdo" or bruessles....
even IF THE TERRORISTS ARE THE SAME VARIETY THAT WERE TRAINED BY YOUR VERY OWN CIA?
YA?