Donald Trump - Opinions?

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Yes fair enough. But bear in mind that American strategy has been fairly consistent for roughly two centuries in terms of its broader strokes. There is a certain logic to it. I don't think isolationism has much of a place now unfortunately. However much I would find that attractive as an ideal. The reality is that I'm not even sure Russia would find it appealing either. Where the other powers disagree with the United States tends to be where their interests overlap. But you'll find that where they don't, they'll often hope that the United States is there to deal with any issues that arise. As things stand the United States is the only global power that really is everywhere. Trust me no one would like the vacuum that could exist in their absence

dearest federberg...your comment is all the more reason -- if we are discussing


a ''choice" between mediocrities as ''world leaders" aspirants...

that whatever TRUMP might turn out -- based on what he is known for already --

the RECORD of hillary is -- without fuirther ado -- that of A monstrous war criminal, both in her official positions, as influence, as ''adviser" -- as politician, and that of her husband's as well as the ''powers" that SHE comports with ..

i mean WHAT MORE ''writing on the wall" does one WANT?

IS IT still THAT DIFFICULT for westerners to INTONE the words

"war criminals|" about people who aspire to 'president of the USA" just because they have gotten so used to the likes of the MENDACITIES from the likes of KERRY (RECENTLY EXPOSED as having been, behind his ''oh so wise, so balanced diplomat " -- was EAGER for bombing syria, ) -

?

THESE are war crminals -- hillar no less -- and trump at least does not YET have that record - even were he to decalre "i will be ready to push the nuke button" -- JUST AS HILLARY has ALWAYS LUSTED after it already..,

to whom MERE sanctions, MERE few squirmishes are no longer enough

but really to ''' SHOW THE WORLD WE'RE THE BOSS -- WITH THE BIGGEST MUSCLES AROUND?"

THAT IS who she is, federberg. and her LUST for it -- such destructive power has no limit that she is NOW openly , DEFIANTLY committing real violations of even YOUR own supposedly ''holy electoral procedures"

and damn what may come -- she's GONNA get her nomination!!

that's how DELIRIOUS she is for ""my turn" to show obama ''WAS A WIMP COMPARED TO ME!!"...

to show

GEORGE BUSH JR "had balls but was STUPID -- OBAMA was smart but NO BALLS -- ME -- I'M SMART AND WITH BALLS bigger than anyone in the world"!!


that's who she IS, federberg. how many WOMEN WAR CRIMINALS (and this has nothing to do with feminism or ''sex identities" nonsense and all that politically correct talk -- women are PROVING, through the americans -- as JUST AS LUSTFUL for blood and war as their men!)

has the USA had now?

MADELEINE ALBRIGHT..CONDOLEEZA RICE, SUSAN RICE, VICTORIA NULAND, SAMANTHA POWERS, even that PROFITEERING NATALE JARESKO -- WHO NOW insists, after getting a QUICK ctizenship in ukraine to GET her job as ''fnance minister " of a FOREIGN COUNTRY -- NOW DEMANDS TO BE unelectedly BE GIVEN

FULL CONTROL of ukraine as PRIME MINISTER BECAUSE "'we are experts" she says!


and of course KILLARY KILLTON.

THE REAL BIG MAMA OF THEM who wants to gorge on DEATH nad destruction if coutnries DEFY her EMPIRE! TO SHOW -- as she herself has variously said:

"to show that WE are the leaders of the world"!

============================

teddy jLog out
17:53 GMT +3 hours01 April 2016

Live
Search
1037321109.jpg

The Empire of the Petrodollar and the Price of Refusing It
© AP Photo/ Hasan Jamali, File
World
14:59 01.04.2016(updated 17:10 01.04.2016) Get short URL
103181500
Ahead of the meeting of OPEC and non-OPEC oil producers scheduled for April 17 in Qatar in a bid to stabilize plummeting crude prices, let’s have a look at oil's financial heart, the petrodollar system, and the unfortunate position of those member states who tried to break free of it.
OPEC members and key oil producers from outside the cartel are set to meet in Qatar’s capital Doha on April 17 in a bid to stabilize plummeting crude prices.

1035966168.jpg

© AFP 2016/ OLYA MORVAN
ROPEC in Focus: Will Russia End Up Controlling 73% of the World's Oil?
The meeting is a "follow-up" to the talks between Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela held earlier in February, where they proposed an accord to freeze oil output at January levels, the first significant agreement between OPEC and non-OPEC producers in 15 years.
The Qatari oil minister and current OPEC President, Mohammed Al Sada said in a statement that 15 countries accounting for some 73 percent of global oil output supported further action.

Meanwhile, let’s have a look at the system which underlies the standardization of oil prices and the fate of those countries who once wished to abandon it.

The Empire of the Petrodollar

Soon after the collapse of the Bretton Woods gold standard in the early 1970s, when the US unilaterally abandoned the Gold Standard which pegged the value of the dollar to the price of gold, and all other currencies were pegged to the dollar, the US struck a deal with Saudi Arabia to standardize oil prices in dollar terms.

1026864203.jpg

© AP Photo/ Vahid Salemi
Iran's De-Dollarization of Oil Is About Business, Not Politics
Though no formal proof exists for the oft-repeated assertion, Turkish conservative daily newspaper Yeni Safak recalls that it was Richard Nixon's Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, who made a secret visit to Saudi Arabia as early as 1972, to fix and set what became later called the "petrodollar system and petrodollar recycling."
Kissinger may have sealed a deal whereby Saudi Arabia would formally and solely accept dollars for all its oil sales, and would exert its power over the Arab region to ensure other Gulf exporters did the same.

Saudi Arabia would then make available and place "surplus liquidities," unspent dollars, in the US Federal Reserve system, starting with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.


The petrodollar recycling system thereby elevated the US dollar to the world's reserve currency and brought massive advantages to the US.

Worldwide, any buyer and importer of Arab oil would first need to buy and hold dollars, ensuring strong global demand for the US currency.

Secondly, the surplus or unspent dollars that each state would accumulate in its national treasury would needed to be "recycled.”

1033387888.jpg

© AFP 2016/ ATTA KENARE
Iran Playing 'Chess' With US by Moving Away From the Petrodollar
These surplus dollars are spent on domestic consumption, lent abroad to meet the balance of payments of developing nations, or invested in US dollar denominated assets.
This last point, is the most beneficial for the US dollar; as the petrodollars make their way back to the US, these recycled dollars are used to purchase US securities (such as Treasury bills), which creates liquidity in the financial markets, keeps interest rates low and promotes non-inflationary growth.

These "petrodollars" going straight into the Federal Reserve system, backstop the US dollar, and enable the strategy of "controlled devaluation," needed to help service growing US debt by devaluing the money used to repay loans, to operate without running out of control and turning into an inflation rout.

The Sad Fate of the Refuseniks

Yeni Safak recalls the unfortunate position of those member states who once attempted to get out of the system.


Back in November 2000, Baghdad insisted on and received UN approval to sell oil through the oil-for-food program for euros. Iraq had threatened to suspend all oil exports — about 5 percent of the world's total — if the body turned down the request.

According to The Guardian’s report on the issue, “Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction was not really the issue — and neither was Saddam himself.”

1032419763.jpg

© AFP 2016/ ATTA KENARE
Will Iran, China, Russia Push US Dollar to the Brink of Extinction?
“The real issue is candidly described in a 2001 report on "energy security" — commissioned by then US Vice-President Dick Cheney — published by the Council on Foreign Relations and the James Baker Institute for Public Policy. It warned of an impending global energy crisis that would increase "US and global vulnerability to disruption," and leave the US facing "unprecedented energy price volatility."
In 2001, Venezuela’s ambassador to Russia spoke of Venezuela switching to the Euro for all their oil sales. Within a year there was a coup attempt against Chavez, reportedly with assistance from the CIA.

Back in 2009 then president of Libya Muammar Gaddafi was named the head of the 53-member body of the African Union.

According to more than one observer, Gaddafi put forward a plan to quit selling Libyan oil in US dollars, demanding payment instead in gold-backed “dinars” (a single African currency made from gold).

The regime, sitting on massive amounts of gold, estimated at close to 150 tons, was also pushing other African and Middle Eastern governments to follow suit.

1026863953.jpg

© Flickr/ Justin Vidamo
Oil Prices Slump: How Sino-Russian De-Dollarization May Save the Day
Right afterwards Gaddafi changed from “a model” and “important ally” to becoming the next target for regime change.
Numerous reports suggest that in 2005-2006, the Tehran government developed a plan to begin competing with New York's NYMEX and London's IPE with respect to international oil trades — using a euro-denominated international oil-trading mechanism.

The clear aim was to establish a firm foothold of the euro in the international oil trade.

Now, as many more countries, including Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and others are talking of breaking free from the petrodollar system, their joint meetings become more and more intriguing.


Read more: http://sputniknews.com/world/20160401/1037326591/petrodollar-recycling-system.html#ixzz44aYJiX1h

===============================



, member: 13"]Yes fair enough. But bear in mind that American strategy has been fairly consistent for roughly two centuries in terms of its broader strokes. There is a certain logic to it. I don't think isolationism has much of a place now unfortunately. However much I would find that attractive as an ideal. The reality is that I'm not even sure Russia would find it appealing either. Where the other powers disagree with the United States tends to be where their interests overlap. But you'll find that where they don't, they'll often hope that the United States is there to deal with any issues that arise. As things stand the United States is the only global power that really is everywhere. Trust me no one would like the vacuum that could exist in their absence[/QUOTE]
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Wow! that's a bit too long for me to get through mate. Can you summarise in a couple of sentences?

killar killton is a bloodlusting war criminal who can't wait to have HER TURN to REALLY ''CALL THE SHOTS" -

trump is BOORISH , rich businessman with racist overtones who loves money .

choose your pick., or pick your choose...

in each choice -- murka ain't gonna make russia or china kneel , not even iran, and they're NOT trembling in fear either.

that realization for america comes either through hillary's BOMBS or TRUMP'S deals.

you choose.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Wow! that's a bit too long for me to get through mate. Can you summarise in a couple of sentences?

t would be better if ROGER FEDERER was president

at least the guy is actually smart and does have a gentle soul,
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,762
Reactions
14,928
Points
113
t would be better if ROGER FEDERER was president

at least the guy is actually smart and does have a gentle soul,
Federer is not that smart. He's an athlete that left school at 16. But he is exactly as qualified as Trump is to be President of the United States, i.e., not at all. And yes, he's massively kinder.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Federer is not that smart. He's an athlete that left school at 16. But he is exactly as qualified as Trump is to be President of the United States, i.e., not at all. And yes, he's massively kinder.

of course when we are talking about being a true professional -- in the proper sense of the word:

professional in being responsible to a job, etc..whatever the job is --

then we all know few are really qualified to be ''leaders" of - my gosh -- NATIONS!

but you know i was talking more about the person's character. roger has a gentle heart and he is thoughtful, i think. we all know he has had his times of ''i am god's gift" to the world too - but we understand in their profession that can be a temptation...but on the whole roger has matured so well. and high-school grad or not - at least in HIS profession he has good leadership qualities, would think.

who would be willing to listen in a balanced way to different viewpoints - and that kind of thing - and then make as good a judgment as he could if he were in a position lke that. that's more what i meant.

and then we look at the ''professionals" in quotation mark --

such as KILLARY KILLTON -- wow - LAW DEGREE -- WOW - IVY LEAGUE - WOW - STATE DEPARTMENT OF THE greatest everest most exceptional people in history ever -wow...wow wow wow. .raises gazillions of moolah -- wow...

and what does she do ? oh - my she LOVES BLOOD!

something is very wrong about a system that actually has people like THAT be campaigning and very likely WILL be crowned EMPRESS of the Universe in the Land of the MASTERS of the UNIVERSE...

when -- such a person as, say CYNTHIA MCKINNEY , who of course was so smeared she lost her job as representative from california , u know she opene dher mouthg too much about the EMPIRE she lives in and all the BLOOD that flows across the world from the EMPIRE'S behavior

- had at least as good ''educational and professional credentials" and might actually CARE about people as a leader --

is marginalized.
 
Last edited:

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Wow! that's a bit too long for me to get through mate. Can you summarise in a couple of sentences?


on the other hand FEDERBERG - if you REALLY think EMPRESS -CAN'T WAIT TO SIT ON HER THRONE killary..

who lusts after the power to decide who dies and who lives in this world - which country gets destroyed first and which one is NEXT - BY THE American Empire - f they don't BOW -

IS SUCH A SAFER ''candidate" why do you THNINK obama, albright, brzezinski, nuland, practically ALL the authors of so much destruction of ENTIRE COUNTRIES over the past 3 decades - because such countries TRIED TO ESCAPE america's CLAWS of PETRO-DOLLAR domination -

are ALL BEHIND KILLARY? because SHE will continue and RAISE the level of AMERICAN EMPIRE destruction of countries everywhere if the world and its countries DO NOT SUBMIT to the 'masters of the universe".

see -- you have to understand THIS IS what empires DO - when their DECLINE is already in process -- they WILL go on a destructive path even more than what brought them there in order to CLING to that position with all their might -- damn what the consequences are . THAT'S what all these american invasions of iraq, libya, syra, yemen, afghanistan, pakistan, encricling china and russia, massing troops and missiles pointed AT russia meters away from RUSSIA'S borders - are all about. .that's what the NSA surveillance of the world , the CIA regme change operations left and right, the sabotaging of BRAZIL going on right now on MORE fraudulent charges ...with the USA'S collaborator rghtwing fascist oligarchs n brazl - the torture programs, the BALD-FACED

OUTRIGHT TRUMPED UP EXCUSES OF KIDNAPPING foreign citizens and imprisoning them in the USA WITHOUT CHARGES OR EVIDENCE to threaten and have leverage over governments (such as kidnapping a russian citizen who is a commercial pilot -- in africa - trumped charges of ''drug smuggling" in countries that are NOT america's business -- and REFUSING rusisan officials to check on his HEALTH in ISOLATION in new york city jals)

that's what these things are about -- the EVIL EMPIRE that IS the USA ruled by the lkes of OBAMA, CLINTONS, KERRY, SAMANTHA POWERS, CHENEY, BUSH, etc. etc. etc.

knows it is RUNNING OUT OF TIME before more countries that are emerging into their own independence

finally have ENOUGH of the USA BLACKMAILING their economies THAT THEY FIND WAYS to create NEW centers of power that the USA can NOT intmidate forever!

so -- what does the USA do -- such as under ''OBAMA'S LEADERSHIP" -- AND after him the likes of KILLARY?

WH -- GO ON EVEN MORE KILLING SPREES across the world to show "'WE-RE THE BOSS -- IF YOU DON'T FOLLOW OUR RULES -- AND ACCEPT OUR WAYS AND LET OUR CORPORATIONS RUN YOUR ECONOMIES -- AND CONTINUE TO BUY US TREASURY DOLLAR DEBT SO WE CAN OFFLOAD OUR DEBT ON TO YOUR ECONOMIES -- WE ARE GOING TO DESTROY YOU -- WE ARE going to send our DEATH STARS TO YOU AND BOMB YOUR WEDDING PARTIES AND SAY YOU ARE TERRORISTS!"!

====================================================
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Wow! that's a bit too long for me to get through mate. Can you summarise in a couple of sentences?



Search
1036864795.jpg

Obama Campaigned on Peace, But Brought Death and War Worldwide
© Flickr/ Crash Symbols
Opinion
01:21 02.04.2016(updated 05:05 02.04.2016) Get short URL
9842130
With promises to keep Americans out of a state of never-ending war, President Obama and his fleet of unmanned drones have expanded conflict to nearly every region of the world.
Barack Obama campaigned on a promise to scale back US military engagement in the Middle East and to keep America’s soldiers from getting bogged down in never-ending regional civil wars. President Obama has kept park of that campaign promise, with America’s troop presence abroad reduced. But US military engagement, as a whole, has increased significantly, through the use of unmanned drones and the deployment of troops in combat and security situations in more countries than in 2009.

1037306120.jpg

© AFP 2016/
Erdogan's Guards Violence Against Peaceful Protesters ‘Unacceptable’ - DOS
Obama’s White House ended the previous administration’s Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom — combat missions in Iraq and Afghanistan that continued to fester following George W. Bush’s attempts at regime change in Baghdad and the bombing of mountains into submission around Kabul. Today, despite recent reports that the Defense Department has understated the US troop presence in Iraq, troop levels in each country are down.

Nonetheless, Obama followed up his acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize by expanding US military actions to nearly every country in the Middle East and North Africa, while reviving a Cold War posture toward Russia and China.

For instance, during the so-called Arab Spring, the US undertook a military campaign against Libyan dictator Muammar al-Qaddafi, leading to the leader being deposed and killed in the streets. The ousting of Qaddafi turned the once thriving country into a hotbed for Daesh extremists and today Libya is largely considered a failed state.

1037165730.jpg

© AFP 2016/ KENA BETANCUR
Was It Something He Said? 7 in 10 US Women Hate Donald Trump
Under Obama, the US has expanded drone wars in Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria with limited results and many civilian deaths.

Reports by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism suggest that the majority of US drone strikes result in civilian casualties, but under Obama these casualties have been defined away by invoking a macabre redefining of the “kill box” – anybody within a certain proximity to targeted victim is deemed a combatant.

The US today now finds itself performing aggressive joint military exercises with the South Koreans, seen as dress rehearsals for a full-scale invasion of North Korea — a nuclear capable country. American and NATO forces are posted along the Russian border in Norway to prepare for potential offensive actions against Moscow justified by the fantasy of Russian military aggression in Europe. US forces are now fighting in not only Iraq and Afghanistan, but also in Syria, Libya, and Yemen.

1033904117.jpg

© Sputnik/ Igor Zarembo
Obama: World Must Do More to Stop Flow of Terrorists
The paradox of the Obama Administration is how a president who campaigned on getting us out of war in Iraq and Afghanistan has now committed the US to the escalation of several recent wars.

Obama is no dove, and the world is no safer. With unmanned drone use increasing overseas, perpetual war has never been rebranded so effectively.


Read more: http://sputniknews.com/analysis/20160402/1037356841/obama-peace-death-war-daesh.html#ixzz44dmaWEgs
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
THE ABOVE ARTICLE fairly summarizes what OBAMA THE EMPEROR

LEAVES AS A SETTING -- READY FOR THE EMPRESS KILLARY T0 BUILT ON.

that's the TRUTH of american foreign policy -- ENDLESS WAR as the justification for and REASON for the existence of the american EMPIRE.

ANYONE that says it is not -- is either lying to themselves -- or DEFENDING the indefensible.

it can not be any other way.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Wow! that's a bit too long for me to get through mate. Can you summarise in a couple of sentences?


imagine KILLARY -- whose husband BILL initiated and expanded since the 1990's the attempted CONQUEST of russia...literally --

by inserting the american influence right inside russia through the YELTSIN , GORBACHEV TRAITORS - AND THE ''NEO-LIBERAL" crowd so enamored of being ''liked by the west" --

and the EXPANSION OF NATO towards russia IN VIOLATION of the treaties between russia and NATO/USA in 1989..THAT

RUSSIA wold dismantle the WARSAW PACT -- and the NATO WOULD NOT EXPAND ''an inch towards russia".

-- NOW IMAGNE KILLARY CONTINUING HER HUSBAND'S -- BRZEZINSKI'S DREAM OF ''carving up russia into 3 smaller countries to be more easily manageable"...(by the USA of course -- which they DID attempt in the 1990's when russia was weakened because of GORBACHEV'S TREASON -- just about every russia DETESTS HIM -- FOR being a sell-=out rendering their country open to PLUNDER by the russian oligarchs ON BEHALF OF THE USA and the west -- untl of course PUTIN IN 2001 KICKED THEM OUT) ...


so the question to all of you -- WHO IS THE AGGRESSIVE THREAT TO WHOM?

it ain't russia - NEVER WAS -- it's the USA and before that -- the WESTERN europeans right up to hitler - who

the BRITISH AND AMERICANS actually encouraged and supported -- in order to ''THROW GERMANY AND RUSSIA AT EACH OTHER -- AND WEAKEN BOTH" AS CHURCHILL WISHED (THAT FEW PEOPLE know of)

before the americans and british can then SWOOP IN and LORD IT over the remans...

and the PROJECT CONQUER RUSSIA STILL LIVES...

SO -- really who'se the aggressor? and what HAS HILLARY TO DO WITH IT?

JUST THIS -- SHE'S THE NEXT IN LINE TO CONTINUE THE BLOODY PROJECT OF THE ANGL0-AMERICAN \\world order...

try and REFUTE THAT FOR REAL, HONESTLY. ANY OF YOU.
=======================

Azerbaijani Chopper - MoD
1030193856.jpg

Forget 'Russian Aggression'! Why Pentagon Wants More Troops in Europe
© AP Photo/ Mindaugas Kulbis
Politics
09:27 02.04.2016Get short URL
Topic:
NATO Seeks Expansion to Eastern Europe (210)
032430
When it comes to the US response to the non-existent Russian threat to NATO's eastern flank, Washington's actions do not match its rhetoric, German politician Dr. Alexander Neu told Sputnik, commenting on the Pentagon's plans to increase US military presence in Europe in 2017.


The US is expected to deploy an additional armored brigade and position some of its most modern military hardware in Eastern European countries and the Baltics. The announcement came a month after the Pentagon revealed its plans to quadruple its 2017 budget for European defense.

"If Russia is as provocative and aggressive [as the US claims], I have a question: why has the US postponed the deployment until February 2017? If the [Russian] threat was as major as the US paints it, the deployment should have taken place much earlier," the German MP of the Left Party noted.

Dr. Neu offered his take on this "inconsistency." He maintains that it points to the fact that the "Russian threat" is not an issue. "The US has blown this imaginary threat out of proportion. It is an attempt to increase the anti-Russian sentiment in Europe," he said.


© Sputnik/
Threatophobia

1037257512.jpg

© Flickr/ U.S. Army Europe Images
Russia to Answer Asymmetrically to NATO Major Build–Up in Europe
The plan, according to the Pentagon, is meant to show that the US is genuinely committed to protecting its NATO partners "in the wake of an aggressive Russia in eastern Europe and elsewhere," as Gen. Philip Breedlove put it.
For the German politician this explanation is simply false.

"I just don't see it – this Russian aggression," he said. "Crimea is surely a point of controversy that could be assessed in a number of ways under the international law. I have my own assessment, particularly considering the West's role in breaking up Yugoslavia and the subsequent independence of former Yugoslav republics, including Kosovo. One cannot apply a different logic to what happened with Crimea."

1030193866.jpg

© AP Photo/ Mindaugas Kulbis
Obsolete Alliance: Why It is Time for US to Withdraw From NATO
Dr. Neu also mentioned that it was the West, not Russia that sparked the coup in Ukraine. "I don't see that [Moscow] poses a threat to the Baltic states, Poland, Romania and Bulgaria. This is why this threat is imaginary."
The latest Pentagon's announcement, according to the German politician, could indicate that the US is trying to contain Russia because Moscow does not want to follow what the West wants it to do.


Read more: http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160402/1037363377/russia-us-pentagon-nato.html#ixzz44ePkXo8D
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Too bad teddytennisfan doesn't have any strong opinions. :cool: But, back to Trump: the NYTimes delineates why he'll have a steep climb in the general election, if he's the nominee:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/u...mp-general-election.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0

i know -- i wish i had a stronger opinion...like

Obama ISN'T a war criminal and a supreme liar and waterboy for his white masters..and that he's just the current one in the LONG unbroken line of american imperial presidents...\

GEORGE WASHINGTON -- u know -- actually described it in his correspdences with his 'fellow founding fathers"

"..................this -- our infant empire"...

and yea -- the native peoples and the enslaved found that out soon enough...and so has the REST of the world with the USA'S

''defense of liberty, democracy and the american way" n over 800 military outposts to make sure the world UNDERSTANDS WHO'S the real boss! ...

YA -- I WISH I HAD strong opinions ....that barry really DOES deserve the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE...

especially with the way he spoke in his acceptance ceremony just how REALLY out of step with the times 'today" ''because they are more complex than in his time" --

the GREAT MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. WAS

i wish i had strong opinions on ho wwonderfully OBAMA accepted such a peace prize whilE STOMPING ON

ML KING, JR'S GRAVE and eveyrthing he died for...ya -- i wish had stronger opinions...
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
u knopw

it'\s really quite ironic -- not that i am SURPRISED --

BUT just a year ago

BARRY THE 'DEAR LEADER" --

joked in that disdainful way of his -- about PUTIN AND RUSSIA:

"He's u know,,,like that kid tha tno one likes - sitting at the back of the bus, and at the back of the classroom -- he's got no friends really...

"u - know russia doesn't REALLY produce anything -- it's just as some say -- a GAS AND OIL STATION"...


'' U KNOW they don't really even have a world class army -- WE'RE the strongest military in HISTORY...(''BUT -- they're STILL A THREAT TO THE WORLD) ".

"U know we have succeeded -- the sanctions have ISOLATED russia -- their economy is in TATTERS"...

"U KNOW --whenever there's TROUBLE somewhere in the world -- nobody calls moscow for help -- they call washington dc".

========================

in a few SHORT MONTHS --

russia UNWRAPPED such ADVANCED military gear AND discipline -- at a FRACTION the cost of the TRILION DOLLAR WORTH US MAGNIFICENT ARMY --

with such stupendous effriciency -- the pentagon DARE NOT FLY americfan planes stright into the path of russians without FIRST asking russian permission!

NASA can't even send americans to the space station -- built by russians -- UNLESS the russians agreed to bring them up on RUSSIAN ROCKETS...

IN LESS tjhan a year -- russia - having decded to RESPOND to the illegal economic war EGGED ON BY OBAMA -- TO ''make russia's eocnomy in tatters" -- for DISOBEDIENCE to american empire - (about bombing syria to the medieval ages -- that had to be followed by SENDING IN CIA - TRAINED ISIL terrorists) -

by SUBTITUTING DOMESTIC production for imports the russians decided to NO LONGER BUY from europe (which serves THEM , european right -- leading to THEIR economic export losses in the hundreds of billions ) -

and now -- instead of russians STARVING -- they - after ONE HARVEST SEASON --

ARE THE WORLD'S BIGGEST EXPORTER OF WHEAT, BARLEY AND many more agricultural products
all NATURAL , ORGANIC IN the time-[tested russian tradition -- RATHER THAN MONSANTO of the USA...

and are poised -- now that they HAVE DECIDED they want to do it - to be the world's B IGGEST FOOD SUPPLIER OF NATURAL GROWN FOOD.
!

YA -- and their FOREIGN DEBT -- mostly in outsanding corporate borrowings that are NORMAL in all countries - are the SMALLEST of all industrialized countries - UNLIKE THE USA' 20 TRILLION DOLLAR DEBT THAT IT WON'T EVEN PAY FOR THE INTEREST ALONE (TWICE ALREADY DEFAULTED n the last year alone - although they wont' tell you THAT) --

AND YA --

RUSSIA IS WILLING TO SHOW ITS GOLD RESERVES - REAL ONES -- AS BACK UP FOR ITS CURRENCY AND ECONOMY..,.

UNLIKE THE USA that CLAIMS it has 8,000 tonnes -- but REFUSES to have it checked for real

since 1963 and certainly since nixon took the dollar OFF from collateralizing on GOLD

BECAUSE -- IT LIKELY -- according to all gold market expert observers...

it sold them off to private owners to COVER ITS GROWING DEFICITS FOR DECADES...


YA --

AS THE SPOKES-WOMAN of the RUSSIAN FOREIGN MINISTRY

THAT GORGEOUS LADY -- MARIA ZAKHAROVA quipped -

''yes ..we hear that the US president says that when there's trouble anywhere in the world they call washington for help -- not moscow...

of cousre they do -- and then washingtond calls MOSCOW".


EXCEPT OBAMA IS TOO PROUD TO ADMIT HE IS NO MATCH as a PROPER LEADER - FOR A COUNTRY OR IN THE WORLD

TO VLADIMIR PUTIN...

who obama continues to call |"he's authoritarian"

because PUTIN WON'T SPREAD THE LEGS OF RUSSIA FOR OBAMA'S CORPORATE AMERICA PLUNDER...

excpet of course obama just likes to SHOW WHOS' BOSS in the world

by droning to death wedding parties everywhere n the world ..............ya..........!
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,762
Reactions
14,928
Points
113
@teddytennisfan As federberg alluded to earlier, no one is reading you. Long, tedious diatribe puts people off. Might I suggest joining the conversation? You are not a fan of those you consider "war criminals", etc., as far as I can tell, but you sure carpet-bomb this thread.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Too bad teddytennisfan doesn't have any strong opinions. :cool: But, back to Trump: the NYTimes delineates why he'll have a steep climb in the general election, if he's the nominee:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/u...mp-general-election.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0


nevermind MY opinion or lack of it...


I PARAPHRASE A BIT ,because it's been many months ago i read an interview by a retired AMERICAN CIA,/PENTAGON officer -- keep forgetting his name -- bennet, ? connelly? -- something ...

anyway he offered an nterview to RUSSIA'S SPUTNIK news..(which one of the USA'S wonderful FREE SPEECH , DEMOCRATIC allies LATVIA -- with its celebations of NAZI veterans recently -- BANS sputnik for daring to post REAL info )

\(if i type n BOLD -- they are words i definitely remember - the rest i paraphrase but the gist is the same: )

==============

''i was ASSIGNED TO MOSCOW and tasked with my specialty -- PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE AND SURVEILLANCE...from 1990 and through the decade...

"as teh USSR was dissolved by GORBACHEV and he was followed by YELTSIN who was really our man we liked because they both allowed th eprivatization of russia's national ndustries and resources...

we REALLY DID TRY TO SABOTAGE RUSSIA -- in order to make her compliant to us...

" OUR tsk was to influence their politics from the inside and so we had the politicians and oligarchs we knew we could have on OUR side...

''PUTIN was then a young KGB officer - who was assigned in foreign service and national security - ..
''we immediately noted that HE TOOK THE SIDE OF HIS PEOPLE -- and so we made sure to watch him closely ever since, just as today..."

"all i can say now is this:


'he is fluent in languages, real diplomacy, and just about every area a proper leader must know about..and can speak to his own people in GREAT DETAIL about their concerns -- such as we regularly see for over a decade now in his yearly audience with the nation -- real no script - no telemprompter open questions and asnwers from russians all over their country on any subject -- those famed marathon matters -- 3 - 4- 5 hours -- our own leaders can't even be approached untless questions , very few , are strictly vetted.

''we can only look on in ENVY - at leas tI do -- to see such a leader as he and what the russians produce...WHEREAS WE CAN ONLY SHOW the likes of bush, obama, clinton, even reagan...



who go around the world lecturing everyone BUT SHOW NOTHING BUT ARROGANCE AND IGNORANCE ABOUT THE REST OF THE WORLD THAT WE SHOW OUR SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT THEY SHOULD BOW BEFORE US".

"I AM ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED THAT PUTIN IS THE GREATEST THING THAT EVER HAPPENED TO HIS PEOPLE -- THE RUSSIAN WORLD -- IN A HUNDRED YEARS.

''IN MY HUMBLE OPINION ...VLADIMIR PUTIN -- THERE IS NOT A SINGLE LEADER , country or world today -- THAT HAS GREATER LOVE FOR HIS COUNTRY AND HIS PEOPLE that ACTUALLY ALSO CARES ABOUT REAL PEACE IN THIS WORLD -- THAN VLADIMIR PUTIN".
"
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
@teddytennisfan As federberg alluded to earlier, no one is reading you. Long, tedious diatribe puts people off. Might I suggest joining the conversation? You are not a fan of those you consider "war criminals", etc., as far as I can tell, but you sure carpet-bomb this thread.


YEAHN -- I CARPET BPMB THIS

BUT THAT'S BETTER THAN AMERICA CARPET BOMBING TENS OF MILLIONS IN VIETNAM AND SOUTHEAST ASIA ...

no one reads me -- because HYOU CAN'T TAKE THE TRUITH.

AND THAT SAYS more about YOURSELVES than I

OR THE TRUTH ITSELF.

and this trhead IS supposed to be about what3ever we like to say about matters concerning global events, which incldues WHICH IMPERIAL PRESIDENT is going to be the ''choice" of the

so-called 'FREE american" people..

roflmao
 

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,762
Reactions
14,928
Points
113
YEAHN --
...this trhead IS supposed to be about what3ever we like to say about matters concerning global events, which incldues WHICH IMPERIAL PRESIDENT is going to be the ''choice" of the so-called 'FREE american" people..
Actually, this thread is about Donald Trump and our opinions about him. Extrapolating it into the whole rest of global events, etc. was your idea.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Actually, this thread is about Donald Trump and our opinions about him. Extrapolating it into the whole rest of global events, etc. was your idea.


yes -- it was my idea. .and SO ?

you are what here? some moderator deciding whihc extrapolations are allowed or not?

the choice of world leaders -- certainly of a country as the USA -- AS MEDDLESOME AND DESTRUCTIVE AS THE USA -- IS a proper subject with which to 'extrapolate"


WHEN THE COUNTRY \


THAT CALLS ITSELF \\\the number one -- the exceotional one, the shining city on the hill, believes that it has A

RIGHT as to how other nations decide THEIR fates - sets out in its PRESIDENTIAL, CONGRESSIONAL, PENTAGON, CIA, CORPORATE, ETC POLICIES

AND

SUBSTTUTES AMERICAN ''RULES" OVER THAT OF NATIONS and HYPOCRITICALLY

calls itself a ''democracy\"\ by exportinG war ....

is FAIR GAME for extrapolating on subject htat pertain to such matters.
 

teddytennisfan

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Oct 1, 2015
Messages
3,166
Reactions
498
Points
113
Actually, this thread is about Donald Trump and our opinions about him. Extrapolating it into the whole rest of global events, etc. was your idea.

and as to ''back to donal trump"

i have made known MY opinion on that matter -- PRECISELY - it is extrapolated to the subject of presidency

as to THEIR stated policies (whether they do as ''promised" is another matter -- as OBAMA PROMISED AND CAMPAIGNED ON such a thing as "the most transparent and accountable administration ever"

ONLY TO PROVE THE ENTIRE EXACT OPPOSITE -- known and NOTORIOUS now as the MOST OBSESSIVELY SECRETIVE EVER -- ) ...

YOU -- and others on the other hand -- are attempting to use this FALSE DICHOTOMY argument so as to SILENCE ME -

THAT there is a defined fence between ''discussing the american presidential elections "

from ''WORLD EVENTS'

WELL -- perhaps you HAVE NOT BEEN PAYING ATTENTION...

the americans presidents and pentagon and ITS "FULL SPECTRUM DOMINACE WITH THE ABILITY TO WAGE SEVERAL WARS AT THE SAME TIME ANYWHERE ON EARTH WITH FIRST STRIKE AND SECOND STRIKE SUCCESS"

TO SERVE YOUR AMERICAN EMPIRE'S NOTIONS OF ''leadership"

in a world that DOESN'T WANT NOR EVER DID OR NEEDED --

except what YOU AMERICANS LOVE TO TELL EACH OTHER THAT YOU ''are in so much demand as leaders of the free world" (such NONSENSE) ...

MEDDLE n other countries' affairs so that they will SUBMIT -- and when they DO NOT OR REFUSE


such as iRIAN OR CHINA OR RUSSIA -- YOUR PRESIDENTSl lead the way in meddlng - DESTABILIZING , AND LITERALLY DESTROYING THEM ...

and you are going to TELL ME THE two -- WORLD EVENTS AND AMERICAN ''presidential elections"


are UNRELATED AND AN ''extrapolation" is somehow incorrect?

ONLY THOSE WHO ARE UNABLE TO DISCUSS ISSUES PROPERLY SAY SUCH THINGS.
 
Last edited:

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,762
Reactions
14,928
Points
113
Nobody is trying to silence you, per se. Just hitting the "mute" and "edit" buttons. You're not the only one who's paying attention to the world. But banging other people over the head, shouting with capital letters and having diarrhea of the keyboard doesn't really help your cause. You have other issues. May I suggest that you start a thread of your own?