We'll just have to agree to disagree - and that without even really getting into it. But I can hope that you'll eventually come around to how you've been propagandized, just like you did with covid
.
Hmm. Being warned against propaganda by somebody who believes Daly and Wallace.
But as you keep insisting, that’s not the topic for this thread. I agree.
By the way, I don’t regret getting jabbed, and I know statistically that it’s done some good, but I’m opposed to the way it’s gotten out of control, and the way that big pharma/the left have weaponised it against everyone.
As someone who has traditionally been on the left, even "far left," the whole thing has been quite baffling. One minute we were skeptical of Big Pharma, the next some were getting Pfizer and Moderna tattoos. We used to be for civil liberties (freedom of speech), then we wanted everyone censored. We used to be about tolerance, now anyone who doesn't agree is a nazi. Etc, etc.
I think a lot of it has to do with Trump - he seemed to fry the brains of not only his devotees, but the many who despite him. Further polarization, and everyone is either on this side or that; in the US, Team Blue or Team Red.
Okay, I wonder about this. I agree with you largely, and just how promiscuous the far left have been in hopping into bed with big greedy corporations, both pharmaceutical and media, has been a spectacle that isn’t really surprising, but it has been strange to witness the full embracing extent of it. As I say, it’s a form of totalitarianism and this will be one that’s difficult to shift. As you said above , when people disagree, they’re labelled as Nazis etc. I have a cousin who lives in Canada and she’s often like that. People who disagree with her worldview are routinely dismissed as bigots, Nazis, racists. She has no other way of thinking and unsurprisingly, she never questions her worldview. It would physically pain her to do so.
This much is common, but I’m wondering to what extent we can blame Trump. We can definitely blame him for a lot of things, I’m no admirer, but haven’t the left been intolerant of differing views in this way since a long time before Trump? I remember some scary stuff in Ireland during the same-sex marriage referendum, told to me by a law professor friend of mine. He said an email had whizzed about the offices saying that they “must do something” about a law journalist from a popular broadsheet who had questioned whether the Gaelic translation of the proposed act said exactly the same thing as the English version. Because he questioned this, bizarrely he was labelled a homophobe. This was more than a year before Trump and my professor pal said back then that the universities were rife with this stuff.
The horrible thing is this is exactly how ruling (and authoritarian) governments maintain power: divide the people, set them against each other, and reap the benefits.
As far as covid goes, there was immense propaganda, from fearmongering infographics (the death count on every cable news station), dubious images from China, etc, to catch-phrases like "Trust the Science" irregardless of the contrary and absurd nature of such a statement. "Trust the Science" really means Trust Certain Scientists, and really only those who work for Big Pharma.
The one thing the bad players in all big issues are good with is language, unfortunately. They come up with labels real quick. Catchy phrases that slip through unchecked: “trust the science” is only one, but we’ve been bombarded by propagandist nonsense regarding all the divisive issues for years now, all arriving tucked up neatly in some pithy nonsensical phrase. Trust the science - but the science is excluding itself from scrutiny for 75 years? But…doesn’t it trust itself?
The censorship is perhaps the most worrisome aspect of this, and it goes back to Fauci et al literally blocking the Great Barrington folks, as revealed by emails. But it was all-pervasive. There was a point in which someone couldn't even say on Youtube, "Taking vitamin C may help your immune system better handle covid" - or even more innocuous things than that.
Yeah, the censorship and the fact that social media corporations rules and regulations are basically political manifesto handbooks. They’re slanted in favour of one side, so that five years ago anything that was obviously true (“a woman is an adult biological female”) is prohibited now. Just one small example. Covid released a whole bunch of these troll-like rules. Trigger warnings on Joe Rogan episodes? Because he’s talking to someone? Really Orwellian.
A shrunken might do you a bit of good, my friend.
The missus wakes up every morning with a measuring tape, hoping it’s happened.
She’s a medical herbalist and she didn’t get vaccinated. She’s not against people getting the jab but she’s very solid when it comes to diet, supplements, exercise, taking control of your own health, putting as little unnatural medicines as possible into your body.
But yeah, my girlfriend feels similar to you, although is less skeptical of the vax. But she doesn't regret it, but won't take more.
Exactly. It’s kinda getting ridiculous now because I got my second jab in June 2021 but there are people now on their fourth. It wasn’t a rhetorical question I asked, when I asked how many jabs will people accept. I’m curious about it.
As far as the long-term is concerned, I think the view of those who think it is harmful is that "the less the better." But we shall see. I certainly hope that I and others who think it might be harmful long-term are wrong!
Except for my head size, eh? If I wake up some morning with a pimple on top of my neck, and a squeaky voice, I’ll know not to tell anyone here…