French Open 2015: Rafael Nadal makes a mockery of the rule book
this should get everyone riled up for the French Open!
this should get everyone riled up for the French Open!
Kieran said:There's a few suppositions in the article, mainly that this is Rafa's fault. Not sure that conclusion is safe. Nor do I think the policy of keeping umpires and players who've had serious spats apart from each other is an unwise one. I can see the sense in it. An umpire is there to call it. In this case, he calls it correctly because Rafa is slow, no getting away from it. But if a player feels an umpire is being contrary or arbitrary in how they do things, it's a helluva distraction next time he plays.
I've said it before, chaps, the umps should call Rafa and anybody else up on things, and if they don't, it's not the players fault. But by the same measure, a player might feel the umpires timing sucks, or is vindictive, if they let the clock run all set, then call him on it at 4-4, 30-40. It's the umpires prerogative, in some ways, but if it becomes a case of bad blood, I can see an argument for keeping them apart.
I don't say it's right, but I can see why it could happen...
Riotbeard said:Kieran said:There's a few suppositions in the article, mainly that this is Rafa's fault. Not sure that conclusion is safe. Nor do I think the policy of keeping umpires and players who've had serious spats apart from each other is an unwise one. I can see the sense in it. An umpire is there to call it. In this case, he calls it correctly because Rafa is slow, no getting away from it. But if a player feels an umpire is being contrary or arbitrary in how they do things, it's a helluva distraction next time he plays.
I've said it before, chaps, the umps should call Rafa and anybody else up on things, and if they don't, it's not the players fault. But by the same measure, a player might feel the umpires timing sucks, or is vindictive, if they let the clock run all set, then call him on it at 4-4, 30-40. It's the umpires prerogative, in some ways, but if it becomes a case of bad blood, I can see an argument for keeping them apart.
I don't say it's right, but I can see why it could happen...
Fair, but Rafa's argument is crap overall. Dude you know you're slow, and you're lucky you only got docked a 1st serve. I can't imagine Rafa only went over the time limit twice.
Kirijax said:Like Riotbeard said, they need to work out the rule and then all of the umpires enforce it. They all have a stopwatch don't they?
But it's a sticky issue.
If Bernardes umps Nadal, matches, that could be a distraction for Nadal that he doesn't need. Of course, Nadal is the cause of said distraction but that's another issue. You don't want a player's performance on court to be affected by who's in the chair if at all possible.
If Bernardes is taken off of Nadal matches, then it looks like the tennis big-wigs are catering to Nadal and his pouty pouts and that doesn't look good to the other players or the fans.
Simple solution, make all of the players and umps follow the same rules. It's not a dodgy basketball phantom foul or a deflated football for crying out loud. You have a clock. Follow it!
Kieran said:Riotbeard said:Kieran said:There's a few suppositions in the article, mainly that this is Rafa's fault. Not sure that conclusion is safe. Nor do I think the policy of keeping umpires and players who've had serious spats apart from each other is an unwise one. I can see the sense in it. An umpire is there to call it. In this case, he calls it correctly because Rafa is slow, no getting away from it. But if a player feels an umpire is being contrary or arbitrary in how they do things, it's a helluva distraction next time he plays.
I've said it before, chaps, the umps should call Rafa and anybody else up on things, and if they don't, it's not the players fault. But by the same measure, a player might feel the umpires timing sucks, or is vindictive, if they let the clock run all set, then call him on it at 4-4, 30-40. It's the umpires prerogative, in some ways, but if it becomes a case of bad blood, I can see an argument for keeping them apart.
I don't say it's right, but I can see why it could happen...
Fair, but Rafa's argument is crap overall. Dude you know you're slow, and you're lucky you only got docked a 1st serve. I can't imagine Rafa only went over the time limit twice.
Of course, and they should enforce it earlier in the first set, rather than maybe deep in the fourth set. I find it ridiculous that they don't...
Kieran said:No, I don't believe so. He's capable of speeding up, if only reluctantly. He takes so long because they allow him to...
Kieran said:No, I don't believe so. He's capable of speeding up, if only reluctantly. He takes so long because they allow him to...
Riotbeard said:That's pretty egregious. Tennis needs to better figure out rule enforcement.
nehmeth said:Kieran said:No, I don't believe so. He's capable of speeding up, if only reluctantly. He takes so long because they allow him to...
Except when Bernardes holds him to it. Then the ump get's sh*t-can kicked to the curb. :snicker
Kieran said:nehmeth said:Kieran said:No, I don't believe so. He's capable of speeding up, if only reluctantly. He takes so long because they allow him to...
Except when Bernardes holds him to it. Then the ump get's sh*t-can kicked to the curb. :snicker
The problem isn't that he pulls him up on it, it's when he does. That sends a wrong signal to players. He should enforce it within the first three service games of the match, not deep in a fourth set, which we've seen...