brokenshoelace
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 9,380
- Reactions
- 1,334
- Points
- 113
federberg said:Broken_Shoelace said:federberg said:Broken_Shoelace said:Anyway, I think we can all learn a valuable life lesson here: Whatever your illness, whatever your condition, no matter how serious it is/can get, it may affect your life and health, but never your tennis. A word to the wise.
I just don't understand the purpose of bringing these ailments up. If he feels well enough to play, why have sympathy for him if he ends up losing.. Anyway.. it's just my opinion.
I have zero sympathy for a multi-millionaire doing what he loves for big money if his main problem is "I have this condition that's preventing me from showing levels of talent that most normal people could only dream of for a few tournaments."
I bring up the ailments when people act like nothing is wrong with him and him playing so badly is the norm for him on this surface (which is absolutely not true). That doesn't mean I sympathize. As far as I'm concerned, Nadal's season ended the moment he pulled out of the US Open, so I honestly have little emotional investment in any of his matches, and certainly not enough to sympathize.
I certainly didn't say that his level was the norm for this surface. But I do agree with Front that he seemed to perform ok in the previous matches. It leaves a bad taste in the mouth, when the idea is put forward that the only reason he can play badly is his ailment. I mean... what are his team doing for their money? If he was at risk he wouldn't have been allowed to play. It seems to me entirely more plausible that his usual patchy form at this time of the season as well as his lack of playing time in recent months are sufficient reason to explain this performance. To bring up appendicitis because of this is precisely why non Rafa fans roll their eyes when every poor performance has to be explained away by injuries
Equally, I roll my eyes at Rafa fans who act like his appendicitis didn't affect his performance when Nadal is basically done for the rest of the season and will probably have surgery. Again, you tell me which one is an argument you'd put more stock in.
Rafa trashed two no-name players? You don't think a player of his ability could probably overcome his ailment enough to do that, and that the moment someone was going to play remotely good tennis, he was done? I mean, was I the only one actually paying attention to his level in the last few weeks? This isn't an isolated loss.
Like seriously, do you guys believe that tennis players ARE NEVER affected by injury? Because based on this, you really don't seem like you do. But in case you do, what bigger proof do you need than a guy playing badly, losing to players he has no business losing to, pulling out for the rest of the season and being scheduled for surgery (keep in mind both of these things were announced before he actually lost. Unless you think it's nothing but BS and preemptive excuse making)? I'm seriously asking. Like what would make you believe a player's performance was affected by injury?
Or maybe I'm too harsh. Maybe if a player starts out fine, gets injured mid match, and his movement and/or serving are hampered, then you would buy into the injury.... Oh wait.