Front242
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 23,008
- Reactions
- 3,952
- Points
- 113
Kieran said:Buddy, we're trying to save you from embarrassment. You're predictable as clockwork. Soon as Rafa rises, you emerge with your incoherent insinuations, your dizzy stream of bile, your "mono"-eyed attack on one player, while being completely inconsistent when the same illogical method is turned on your favourite.
It's officially boring, because it's so base and childish. Try stick to something you half-know about, eh? Tennis...
EDIT: Oh, and yeah, the weather is fabulous! I got a bit of colour yesterday, walking along the sea. long may it last...
What's inconsistent about it? Federer played a long match against Monfils at the 2014 USO and you saw how he looked against juice boy Cilic next match, right? Flat as a pancake. He wasn't beating juice boy that tournament anyway, no one was. The longest 3 setter ever played at the Olympics v Del Potro, 19-17 in the 3rd set. Gee, guess what, he was knackered against Murray in the final. This is natural, the way any normal non juiced/doped player would be after a long, gruelling match. Likewise Roger tanking 2 sets in the USO semi against Novak by his own admission to save energy for a 5th set. Juiceheads don't need to do this. Every big tournament we say the same thing: to do well at the slams or go deep at any tough event, masters 1000 etc, Federer NEEDS to win fast and easily to be fresh for the next match 'cos he tires normally. This is the complete opposite of the 2 guys Murray is suspicious of and rightly so. There is nothing inconsistent about anything I'm saying. But there's everything wrong with changing the subject and trying to hope we all fail to notice what's in front of us when we see Duracell bunnies running endlessly match after match with no sign of tiring. The Nadal camp may be blind, naive and downright stupid, but the rest of us aren't.