Australian Open Day 2: Tuesday, Jan 14 - Order of Play

[GameSetAndMath]

Shame about Tomic's injury as it looked like being a very good match if he had full mobility. Even so what was played was entertaining viewing.

I thought Tomic will take set off Nadal. But it ended up Rafa taking a set off Tomic.

 

[GameSetAndMath]

According to match statistics, No. 133 Duckworth had more winners than Federer
in the 1st round match.

 

[Front242]

According to match statistics, No. 133 Duckworth had more winners than Federer
in the 1st round match.

Certainly looked that way when I watched it alright. Fed won but he's not getting past any decent players if his form doesn't improve. At least the weather is cooling down bigtime from Saturday which will help recovery. Cooling down for me anyway, off to Iceland Thursday-Monday. Will miss loads of tennis though unfortunately.

 

[brokenshoelace]

According to match statistics, No. 133 Duckworth had more winners than Federer
in the 1st round match.

Whoa...what? I didn't see the match so I can't tell if it's a case of Duckworth just going for broke on every shot and either missing or hitting a winner, or Roger struggling to adjust to the conditions or not... That's definitely surprising.

 

[Luxilon Borg]

So much for Hewitt.

Gosh I am thrilled to see Rat Face gone. Loved seeing someone shake their fists in his face.

Enjoy the Brisbane title Rusty.:lolz:

 

[GameSetAndMath]

According to match statistics, No. 133 Duckworth had more winners than Federer
in the 1st round match.

Whoa...what? I didn't see the match so I can't tell if it's a case of Duckworth just going for broke on every shot and either missing or hitting a winner, or Roger struggling to adjust to the conditions or not... That's definitely surprising.

Well, Federer's Winners - UFE is more than Duckworth's Winners - UFE.
But, if you just look at number of Winners alone, Duckworth has more than Fed.
This may indicate, he was going for broke.

I didn't get a good feel of the match as I watched it on TV where they constantly switch
you around the different matches.

 

[Luxilon Borg]

According to match statistics, No. 133 Duckworth had more winners than Federer
in the 1st round match.

Whoa...what? I didn't see the match so I can't tell if it's a case of Duckworth just going for broke on every shot and either missing or hitting a winner, or Roger struggling to adjust to the conditions or not... That's definitely surprising.

Well, Federer's Winners - UFE is more than Duckworth's Winners - UFE.
But, if you just look at number of Winners alone, Duckworth has more than Fed.
This may indicate, he was going for broke.

I didn't get a good feel of the match as I watched it on TV where they constantly switch
you around the different matches.

Was Darren Canill spreading misinformation when he said Fed's frame is 95 and not 98 sq inches?

 

[brokenshoelace]

According to match statistics, No. 133 Duckworth had more winners than Federer
in the 1st round match.

Whoa...what? I didn't see the match so I can't tell if it's a case of Duckworth just going for broke on every shot and either missing or hitting a winner, or Roger struggling to adjust to the conditions or not... That's definitely surprising.

Well, Federer's Winners - UFE is more than Duckworth's Winners - UFE.
But, if you just look at number of Winners alone, Duckworth has more than Fed.
This may indicate, he was going for broke.

I didn't get a good feel of the match as I watched it on TV where they constantly switch
you around the different matches.

Was Darren Canill spreading misinformation when he said Fee's frame is 95 and not 98 sq inches?

Federer's frame is 98 inches.

 

[Luxilon Borg]

According to match statistics, No. 133 Duckworth had more winners than Federer
in the 1st round match.

Whoa...what? I didn't see the match so I can't tell if it's a case of Duckworth just going for broke on every shot and either missing or hitting a winner, or Roger struggling to adjust to the conditions or not... That's definitely surprising.

Well, Federer's Winners - UFE is more than Duckworth's Winners - UFE.
But, if you just look at number of Winners alone, Duckworth has more than Fed.
This may indicate, he was going for broke.

I didn't get a good feel of the match as I watched it on TV where they constantly switch
you around the different matches.

Was Darren Canill spreading misinformation when he said Fee's frame is 95 and not 98 sq inches?

Federer's frame is 98 inches.

Thanks, then Darren needs to get in information straight.