I agree with you regarding the crowds but, not only on this semifinal, throughout the 2025 tournament. Yes that 2019 Wimbledon crowd did over support Federer, but lets stick with the present day and context, hmmmmmmmmI'm shocked and embarrassed for Aussies behaving so disrespectfully of a 10 X champion who won a rec. 3 titles str. TWICE! Why Booo a retirement?? It's becoming common place these days; even w/ kids almost half his age! When it comes to the mass disrespect on display, even at Wimbledon where classless fans "over-supported" Fed over Djokovic back in 2019! Be a fan; why become an arena of collective jerks "down under?" I won't miss watching much after he retires! People lamented Roger retiring & cautioned wishing him gone! The same can & should be said of Djokovic who BEAT Alcaraz in the QF! He's not done! Recovery is another thing!![]()
I was going to watch Djokovic agains Rune in Copenhagen next week, when Denmark and Serbia will play Davis Cup. I'm really not happy with Nole being injuried....
Off course I am, and I´m going til see it anyway. But it would have been a dream of mine to see a match between Nole and Holger.so if Djokovic does not come and play the Davis Cup, you're not interested in the DC at all ?
Remember, Roger played the entirety of his semifinal match against Novak after he suffered his injury at the 2020 Australian Open. He could have withdrawn (like Rafa did at Wimbledon) or retired from his match (like Novak did today). But Roger never takes the easy way out. That's why crowds "over support" Roger.I'm shocked and embarrassed for Aussies behaving so disrespectfully of a 10 X champion who won a rec. 3 titles str. TWICE! Why Booo a retirement?? It's becoming common place these days; even w/ kids almost half his age! When it comes to the mass disrespect on display, even at Wimbledon where classless fans "over-supported" Fed over Djokovic back in 2019! Be a fan; why become an arena of collective jerks "down under?" I won't miss watching much after he retires! People lamented Roger retiring & cautioned wishing him gone! The same can & should be said of Djokovic who BEAT Alcaraz in the QF! He's not done! Recovery is another thing!![]()
Remember, Roger played the entirety of his semifinal match against Novak after he suffered his injury at the 2020 Australian Open. He could have withdrawn (like Rafa did at Wimbledon) or retired from his match (like Novak did today). But Roger never takes the easy way out. That's why crowds "over support" Roger.
I said that barring injury, Novak will win again. This may be the injury that derails that. As was proven with Roger, it is tough to recover from a groin injury at that age. Roger came back in 2021 and clearly wasn't the same player.
How he lost that 1st set it was definitely Shapo like.starting to wonder if Shelton is just Shapavalov 2.0. I was not impressed with his game today. So much left on the table
It was a wtf moment really. I honestly tought Novak had Zverev in that TB after that superb lob at 4:4, but Novak's movement was not good today.OMG Novak retired just after he lost the 1st set in the TB? 76(5)
Zverev through to the final 76(5)
Actually it was a wise decision having a groin injury and you dont rest and have the right rehab it can be hard to heal
He has 2 more chances to complete his career slam, 2026 and 2027It's funny but I think the match ups in both finals should encourage close championships. It's all we can hope for. I would have loved Carlito to complete the slams, but another time
Zverev knew that Novak came into the match with an injury, he had 4 BPs on Novak's 2nd serve and still could not break him, same old story too passive, had to be more proactive on his fhand, he just waits for his opponent to make mistakes, dosent go after the ball, how many times in big matches does he do that?It was a wtf moment really. I honestly tought Novak had Zverev in that TB after that superb lob at 4:4, but Novak's movement was not good today.
You mentioned passive Zverev and it's so true. Why he always goes to that same old thing when he knows it doesn't pay dividends? It's all mental IMO. But as crazy as it may sound, I feel Zverev has a chance in a final. He has good H2H against Jannick. They played several close matches and I'm actually looking forward to the final, semis were not fun. Not sure if current level of Novak would trouble Sinner. Let's see how much Zverev really wants that maiden slam title.
I know it's irrelevant in this case, but in a hypothetical scenario had Djoker dropped out BEFORE the match, maybe they should enact a lucky loser-type mechanism where the defeated player progresses in their place. This has been discussed in the past. i.e.Nadal/Kyrgios SF at Wimbledon where some felt Fritz should have progressed after Nadal withdrew.