Why are you guys surprised by the lack of coverage? The AO has always been by far the least prestigious slam. Without the AO the slam tally would Nadal 19, Federer 14, Djokovic 11. Enough said.
Yet more players seem to skip the red dirt and grass of FO and W vs hardcourts of AO. Maybe AO has been harder to win given deeper fields?
nice analysis but another way to put it, who stands taller if we take away their dominant slam?
without FO
Nadal - 7
Novak - 18
Federer - 19
without AO (novak’s best slam)
Nadal - 19
Novak - 11
Federer - 14
without wimbledon (federer’s best slam)
Nadal - 18
Novak - 14
Federer - 12
lowest scores = most 1 dimensional. Rafa - 7, novak = 11, fed = 12
another measure is standard deviation, highest = most 1 dimensional
rafa 5.48
Novak 3.16
Fed 2.94