Moxie
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 43,627
- Reactions
- 14,784
- Points
- 113
I do realize that I was being overly simplistic, parroting what others have said about the two surfaces "switching", which you recognize. I also absolutely do know that Rafa's game works well on the faster surfaces. I still think the changes could help him, but thanks for the more detailed overview.I believe that is not the right way to gauge the surface. They are 2 very different surfaces even though both are hardcourts. One if plexicushion and the other is decoturf. There is no empirical data on the speeds of the courts. People just anecdotally say that the AO has sped up and the UsOpen has slowed down. But there is no direct comparison between the speed of the 2 surfaces. It's like saying Wimbledon is slower than AO, where empirically grass is always faster. UsOpen has been usually considered medium to fast hardcourt where as AO has been slow to medium hardcourt.
The biggest difference in both surfaces is how they handle spin and bounce. It is more difficult to hit through the court at the AO. It doesn't spin and bounce as much. This is why Nadal's ball sits up a little bit and he ends up playing more defense. It is also why Novak is so good here. He controls the center of the court and it almost impossible to hit through him on this surface. Personally, I've always felt that Nadal's game translates better to the UsOpen surface.
Also it is a myth that Nadal plays better on slower surfaces than faster surfaces. He has himself clarified that repeatedly. Nadal's game is harder to handle on surfaces that take more spin and bounce, because his forehand is more effective there.