Moxie
Multiple Major Winner
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 43,867
- Reactions
- 15,041
- Points
- 113
I'm not blaming anyone, just gaming his chances v. Stan. I'd like to see Stan win. Not because I think Stan has any chance against Novak in the next round, but because, like Murray, I'm glad to see him still out there fighting for it.I also feel for him, remember these are tennis professionals and have to be able to cope with weather delays like what happened today at Wimbledon, the forecast was for rain and the weather forecast was correct, we cant control the weather, they did have covers on, then the rain eased off and came back again pronto, the officials made the correct decision to cancel all play on the outside courts. they only have 2 roofs, they could have started matches earlier, seeing the forecast was bad, they didnt,
The forecast for the next 2 days is good.
As to the rest, I saw the debate above and I think a lot of good points were made. I definitely agree with @tented that it's an outdoor tournament, and it should be played as such as much as possible. However, if Australia has 3 roofs, (and they seemed to get used mostly for heat,) then surely Wimbledon could add one. And to @kskate2's point: why not start early if you need to? We all know that it's the lower-ranked players who get screwed by a rain-delayed schedule. Put down the Pimm's and make a proper weather contingency plan!
