Or the Duckman's.The longer the match is the more we get to see Nadal’s beautiful biceps :heart:
Haha. This is reminding me of pretty in pink....
Or the Duckman's.The longer the match is the more we get to see Nadal’s beautiful biceps :heart:
Roger is an enigma. You really can't compare anyone to him.Roger has 4 children. I don't take Isner for an early retirer. He can play a long time with that serve, and feed that kid.
Duckworth is a clown. He is not going to do anything.Nadal lets things get tricky.
He's not an enigma. He has a bazillion dollars and a huge support system. But let's not pretend that male tennis players can't keep playing with a kid at home, or whatever. Isner is the bread winner and this is his best shot at bread-winning. He doesn't care if his ranking slides, if he's still making good money. And he's not first in line for a commentary job when he retires. I think he's got a few more years in him, for sure.Roger is an enigma. You really can't compare anyone to him.
And here we go.......”Duck is a clown”, and what you expected, that he went to win? like I said before I don’t think Istomin will do better, another “clown”Duckworth is a clown. He is not going to do anything.
Every time someone loses to Nadal they're a clown. Unbelievable.Duckworth is a clown. He is not going to do anything.
I have also said Anderson is a clown and he beat Federer.And here we go.......”Duck is a clown”, and what you expected, that he went to win? like I said before I don’t think Istomin will do better, another “clown”
And the Millman is a clown too.Every time someone loses to Nadal they're a clown. Unbelievable.
A boatload of $$ or not, no one else is traveling on the tour w/ 4 munchkins and a wife (nor would they want to).He's not an enigma. He has a bazillion dollars and a huge support system. But let's not pretend that male tennis players can't keep playing with a kid at home, or whatever. Isner is the bread winner and this is his best shot at bread-winning. He doesn't care if his ranking slides, if he's still making good money. And he's not first in line for a commentary job when he retires. I think he's got a few more years in him, for sure.
I have also said Anderson is a clown and he beat Federer.
I'm pretty sure that neither is a "clown." Let's face it, you're just mad that Rafa won. I don't know how anyone who is a top 100 player in the ATP is a clown. Even when they act like one, like Kyrgios.And the Millman is a clown too.
Right, but you do admit that most male players have it as a job, and they have the benefit of a wife at home with the "munchkin." I don't think Isner is giving up the biggest payday job he's likely ever going to have, just when he actually does have a kid. And he started late.A boatload of $$ or not, no one else is traveling on the tour w/ 4 munchkins and a wife (nor would they want to).
We'll see. Like I said, just a feeling I'm getting from him.Right, but you do admit that most male players have it as a job, and they have the benefit of a wife at home with the "munchkin." I don't think Isner giving up the biggest payday job he's likely ever going to have, just when he actually does have a kid. And he started late.
Well, we'll see how you and your witchy feeling do on that. Personally, I think it would be impractical of him.We'll see. Like I said, just a feeling I'm getting from him.
Oh, this is where I got confused. I thought you said he lost the match to Tipsy. No, just the first set. OK. Won in 4.And he lost it to Tipsy
How could I be mad. I expected Nadal to win the match.I'm pretty sure that neither is a "clown." Let's face it, you're just mad that Rafa won. I don't know how anyone who is a top 100 player in the ATP is a clown. Even when they act like one, like Kyrgios.
True. His serve looked good but he lacked the technique. He did well to avoid long points but he was simply inferior. A slightly better player could have made that match interesting, considering that he broke Nadal twice.@atttomole
Yeah the dude couldn't rally at all but his tactics were perfect even though execution of such first-strike tennis fails most times but as the inferior player this was his best shot
True. His serve looked good but he lacked the technique. He did well to avoid long points but he was simply inferior. A slightly better player could have made that match interesting, considering that he broke Nadal twice.