Your reply on that post was this:
"He had knee surgery...
We all saw him fall flat on his face out of nowhere against Raonic at Wimbledon so something was clearly not right with his knee. Nadal has never had any surgery ever, just dodgy treatments such as PCP and I'm not gonna even bother posting about the performance enhancing effects that has. So at least one of them had surgery which clearly wasn't a silent ban. Not sure about the other though.
Also, I never ever once said I'm sure Roger isn't doping, I said there are no obvious signs such as running around like a maniac all the time and never getting tired and never suffering any signs of fatigue after a long match or 2 beforehand."
_____
I've really addressed this. What you don't address is your hypocrisy and double-standard. It's fine if you give lip-service to "maybe" Roger has doped, too. But you've never responded to the massive red flags that was Roger coming back from nowhere and winning the AO. Sure, you give an explanation for Roger, but you have in no way admitted that it's very like what you have used to accuse Rafa, over the years. Can you not even admit that if Rafa had done the same your head would have exploded? That's all I'm asking. Just be fair and honest. Or otherwise admit that you have one standard for Nadal, and another for Federer.
I don't see any massive red flag personally. If his movement was up to par he had a very high chance of making the semis anyway with the current weak competition and with Djokovic losing to Istomin and Murray to Mischa Zverev it made things much easier. You seem to have conveniently forgotten Federer struggled with 5 set matches versus Nishikori and Wawrinka so it's not like he won the whole thing without dropping a set...
Finally, he beat Nadal by being much more aggressive, especially with the backhand, which let's face it is the reason most Nadal fans get angry even thinking about it.
But the most overlooked factor by all of the Federer haters is the one that should actually be most obvious: the surface change. The much faster surface contributed to not only Federer winning as he's the best fast court player on tour, but also to Djokovic losing super early to Istomin and the extra court speed meant Zverev knocked moping Murray out early too. Clearly, the surface change was the most glaringly obvious reason for all of this.
Be thankful to the ATP for ruining the sport and having practically all the courts play at the same shitty, slow speed which has enabled your guy win way more than he otherwise would. If the grass at Wimbledon played like it should and the USO was a proper medium/fast hard court, you'd be accusing Federer of even more doping as he'd be the clear favourite at both even at almost 37. As it currently stands, he's only got one surface which plays decent speed, the AO, and that's only since the surface speed up in 2017. Both Nadal and Djokovic have 3 slow slams now tailor made for them...
