I'm no Nadal fan, but I can guarantee you his goal is not to earn as many points as possible. No one w/ 17 grand slams cares anything about points. They only care about winning slams.Nadal's goal in this tournament is not to win but to gain as many points as possible for YE#1 incase he bombs out at USO.
I think you and I might do best by taking broken's advice and just ignoring this poster sadly...I'm no Nadal fan, but I can guarantee you his goal is not to earn as many points as possible. No one w/ 17 grand slams cares anything about points. They only care about winning slams.
Nadal's goal in this tournament is not to win but to gain as many points as possible for YE#1 incase he bombs out at USO.
I'm no Nadal fan, but I can guarantee you his goal is not to earn as many points as possible. No one w/ 17 grand slams cares anything about points. They only care about winning slams.
They did say Duckworth was recently back from foot surgery and was clearly not up to the 3rd.Sascha through to R2 in straights and one was a bagel set
Trust me, Nadal knows he can't win Wimbledon so he'll try to gain as many points as possible for YE#1 as he could equal Fed with 5 YE#1s which looked crazy in 2016. Winning Wimbledon for dull at this stage is a bonus kindof like French would be for Fed if he played. dull has never defended a non-clay title so it's almost inevitable he drops points at USO so he wants to compensate that by going a round or two ahead in Wimbledon.
Nadal at this point is trying to match Fed's records via the "backdoor" so to speak. So if you say Nadal has only 150-200 weeks at #1, he can say well I have 5 YE#1s or even 6 if the tour doesn't improve by next year. So dull is trying to plug the gaps in his resume at this point and trying to create records that Fed doesn't have.
For Nadal it is always about RG. As long as he wins RG, his year is ALREADY a success. Adding non-clay slams is simply a bonus specially Wimbledon.
I'm sorry, I can't trust you. I've been around this sport too long. I don't have a horse in this race so I can be a little more objective than you and most of the posters here.Trust me, Nadal knows he can't win Wimbledon so he'll try to gain as many points as possible for YE#1 as he could equal Fed with 5 YE#1s which looked crazy in 2016. Winning Wimbledon for dull at this stage is a bonus kindof like French would be for Fed if he played. dull has never defended a non-clay title so it's almost inevitable he drops points at USO so he wants to compensate that by going a round or two ahead in Wimbledon.
Nadal at this point is trying to match Fed's records via the "backdoor" so to speak. So if you say Nadal has only 150-200 weeks at #1, he can say well I have 5 YE#1s or even 6 if the tour doesn't improve by next year. So dull is trying to plug the gaps in his resume at this point and trying to create records that Fed doesn't have.
For Nadal it is always about RG. As long as he wins RG, his year is ALREADY a success. Adding non-clay slams is simply a bonus specially Wimbledon.
That's too bad. Wonder why he didn't withdraw and let a LL take his place. He still would have gotten half of his prize $They did say Duckworth was recently back from foot surgery and was clearly not up to the 3rd.
Wimbledon IS the one grass tournament he can win due to surface. He was also blessed with potentially a very good draw depending on the health of a couple potential roadblocks. He's a threat at this tourney this year due to that. For Roger he needs another great 7 months, there is no doubt he can win 2 or all of the next 3 slams against this amateur field, he just needs to keep the greed high. I sense he was lazy as shit on the recent break, his footwork and movement just seem really poor and it's made his backhand awful. Hopefully it will be corrected after a few rounds. "Embrace destiny or be destroyed by it"
I'm sorry, I can't trust you. I've been around this sport too long. I don't have a horse in this race so I can be a little more objective than you and most of the posters here.
I'm sorry, I can't trust you. I've been around this sport too long. I don't have a horse in this race so I can be a little more objective than you and most of the posters here.
LOL I thought you're a fed fan.
I don't know all of the story, but I thought it worth giving a bit of a caveat to that bagel. No reason to assume that he knew he wasn't fit to play.That's too bad. Wonder why he didn't withdraw and let a LL take his place. He still would have gotten half of his prize $
I like Fed for his greatness. What he adds to the sport I love. I'm not necessarily a fan.LOL I thought you're a fed fan.
She is, she just won't admit it.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
2018 Wimbledon men’s final: Djokovic v Anderson | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 542 | ||
2018 Wimbledon men’s SF: Djokovic v Nadal | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 1193 | ||
R | 2018 Wimbledon SF: Kevin Anderson vs. John Isner | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 307 | |
R | 2018 Wimbledon Quarterfinals: Nadal vs. Del Potro | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 238 | |
2018 Wimbledon Men's QF: Federer - Anderson | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 428 |