2018 Australian Open, Melbourne - ATP GRAND SLAM

[DarthFed]

The asshole is hitting and moving pretty well. Maybe the ATP gave him another one of his patented TUE's for the tournament.

 

[Moxie]

Speaking of @the AntiPusher, he will be completely stoked that his boy Jo Willie T overcame the next genner.

What am I, chopped liver? I love Jo-Wil.

 

[Moxie]

The asshole is hitting and moving pretty well. Maybe the ATP gave him another one of his patented TUE's for the tournament.

Just to be clear, which asshole are you talking about?

 

[DarthFed]

Take a wild guess

 

[DarthFed]

I think Leonardo is a remarkable young man

 

[Moxie]

Take a wild guess

Because I thought you'd put a moratorium on making doping jabs. Lest it make ol' Fed look suspect. He was leaping around like a Lord last night. At 36.

 

[DarthFed]

^ Aint doping jabs. TUE's are legal cheating in the joke ATP and WTA tours.

 

[Moxie]

I think Leonardo is a remarkable young man

You think Leonardo da Vinci was a remarkable painter. Let's face it, you have no idea who Leonardo Mayer is. :lulz2:

 

[DarthFed]

Actually I have seen him play a few times. He once had something like 5 MP's in a match vs. Roger and choked it away. He is one of those decent talents with no ROS or mind, as you are seeing here.

 

[Moxie]

^ Aint doping jabs. TUE's are legal cheating in the joke ATP and WTA tours.

And his 2 TUEs were taken when he was injured and off. Yes, they are doping jabs. You said as much in the above. If you keep doing this, I'm not letting you off the hook on Roger, if you don't quit. Coming back from 7 months off, 4.5 years without a Major, he's the poster child for an "injection" of the fountain of youth.

 

[DarthFed]

Yes, when he was "injured" and came back and had his best seasons ever. Anyways it was legal but it's a ridiculous policy that should've never been in existence.

 

[Moxie]

Yes, when he was "injured" and came back and had his best seasons ever. Anyways it was legal but it's a ridiculous policy that should've never been in existence.

It is shocking how you never see the ironies and inconsistencies of your own posts.

 

[DarthFed]

What irony? Are you saying 2017 was one of Roger's best seasons? It was his 6th best. Also came against probably the weakest field he's ever competed against.

 

[Moxie]

I rather feel for the commentators, but they do say such idiotic things. Cahill declared it a "totally clean" set from Nadal, except for some errors. Um, excuse me...doesn't that make it not a totally clean set? Ah, well, they have to fill air time.

 

[Moxie]

What irony? Are you saying 2017 was one of Roger's best seasons? It was his 6th best. Also came against probably the weakest field he's ever competed against.

That's you. Read the wordsmiths. "One of his best seasons ever!" He did win 2 Majors. Barely lost a match. How do you get 6th best? In any case, there is an irony there. He came off of injury, won the AO at 35 and barely 3 weeks back, and you say, "Nothing to see here, people. Just Roger in a work-a-day." Yet, Rafa, comes back from injury at 25, takes 3 months to win a Major, and you find that suspect.



I'll just wait for that to sink in.

 

[brokenshoelace]

^ Aint doping jabs. TUE's are legal cheating in the joke ATP and WTA tours.

You do realize how absurd "legal cheating" sounds right?

As long as it's legal, it's not cheating. But keep naively believing that the only legal substances "honorable" athletes take are protein shakes.

 

[DarthFed]

You do realize how absurd "legal cheating" sounds right?

As long as it's legal, it's not cheating. But keep naively believing that the only legal substances "honorable" athletes take are protein shakes.

What would you call a policy that legally allows athletes to take banned substances. I'd call it many things, including fucking retarded and legal cheating.

I'm not naive about doping, I'd say you are crazy if you think all athletes are taking PED's. And also I remember that you don't even care if they are cheating which I find again, fucking retarded. I don't know if it's a difference in culture but I will just say there is no one in this country that would bat an eye if Lance was murdered today...no one.

 

[DarthFed]

That's you. Read the wordsmiths. "One of his best seasons ever!" He did win 2 Majors. Barely lost a match. How do you get 6th best? In any case, there is an irony there. He came off of injury, won the AO at 35 and barely 3 weeks back, and you say, "Nothing to see here, people. Just Roger in a work-a-day." Yet, Rafa, comes back from injury at 25, takes 3 months to win a Major, and you find that suspect.


I'll just wait for that to sink in.

I get 6th best since he has had 5 better seasons.

 

[Moxie]

I get 6th best since he has had 5 better seasons.

I'd ask you which they are, but I don't really care. But it's telling that THAT'S what you pulled out of my post. You have no response. Clearly. Roger pulls off a nearly-immediate and miraculous come-back, and you think it's perfectly normal. Nadal pulls one off, at 10 years younger, and you figure that means he dopes. Irony? Inconsistency? I'd say so.

 

[kskate2]

What am I, chopped liver? I love Jo-Wil.

Had no idea. I don't think I ever heard you mention being a fan.