1972Murat said:
I know it is fantasy...we are just having fun. The question is, 11 with a Grand slam versus 17 with none...how much of a game changer is it? Remember, none of the greats of the past 30 years could do it...
It would be an absolute game changer. The calendar year slam is the Holy Grail of tennis. If anyone did it, he would instantly be among the greatest who ever played, especially if they have the current resume that Nole has. Even more so if he finally beat Rafa in Paris, rather than just wait him out.
But nobody will do it next year. The old guard are getting on (Federer) or breaking down (Rafa) or settling down (Novak). And even if Novak played lights out next year, he's not consistent enough to win 28 slam matches in a row. Far as I know, for instance, Rafa will play in Paris, and even in a bad year (2014) he's shown that he's still prohibitive favourite there.
And Rafa won't do it either. Novak is favourite in Oz, but not so solid.
The two slams where nobody is favourite are Wimbledon and the USO. But they maybe the least interesting in 2015, and in Oz and Paris we may have huge eruptions of change. Inevitably, it has to happen in Paris. If Rafa won Oz, I wouldn't mind it at all, once it meant he took more time to get ready for Wimbo. The priorities for Rafa this year must be his health, and winning majors, with more slams off clay being a particular goal...