Front242 said:
El Dude said:
I see some of the same stuff in this match as I did in the Wimbledon final - Roger trying to make the same kill shots he did five years ago, but his opponent getting to them. With Novak it could be written off as him being one of the greatest defenders in the history of the sport, but with Cilic doing it, it makes me think Roger just doesn't have that killer edge any more. I mean, what is different about his slices and shots that once defeated nearly every foe he faced? Why are his opponents getting to them? Is his game just too well known? Or has he slowed just a bit, so his shots have less zip?
His forehand is absolutely nothing like it was. Way too erratic and not enough power on it which is strange given the bigger, stronger racquet.
A forehand seems to be much easier to fix than, say, movement. Roger's movement seems to be good, belying his age - certainly having taken less of a hit than his forehand. I wonder why he can't reclaim his forehand.
I suppose my answer to my own question is that perhaps his movement HAS slowed a bit, which has made it harder for him to get around the ball to really kill it with the forehand. Just a fraction of a second lower and, voila, a more erratic and weaker forehand. Just a theory, though.