Whose GF is most beautiful?

[Horsa]

A picture is worth 1000 words. We need more pictures in this thread.

O.K. It's about beauty after all & a lot of people think beauty is just about looks though some people do see inner beauty too.

 

[GameSetAndMath]

O.K. It's about beauty after all & a lot of people think beauty is just about looks though some people do see inner beauty too.

In that case, please post some x-rays.

 

[Federberg]

I'm not trying to do anything of the sort. Please don't tell me what I'm trying to do unless you can communicate using E.S.P. because you have absolutely no idea what I'm thinking or feeling until I tell you. I'm not attempting to do anything except say what I think & feel, stand up for people of my own gender & explain myself. Now you're mis-reading me. I'm honest. Sometimes your views are very strong. Haven't you thought that on some things other people's views may be just as strong? Everyone is entitled to their own thoughts & opinions. I prefer men being interested in me for my hair, voice or what I say. Everyone is unique. I'm very sorry I can be extremely wordy at times. I disagree that people's private areas should be discussed in public & that it's a trivial matter for ladies to be discussed as just fancy-pieces. Like you said though sometimes women see men the same way which is unfair as in what's good for 1 is good for the other. We're equal so should treat others as such. I will agree to disagree on those points. :0) Good Night!

Lol! I’m not telling you what you’re trying to do. That is what you did. How else can this sentence be explained.

“I don’t like it if men notice I’m top-heavy so why is it o.k. for women to think a man has a nice posterior?”

Odd that you think you’re standing up for your gender by imposing your preferences but each to their own. If some guys get a tickle from women’s personalities without caring about their looks that’s ok with me. I’m not bothered I have my own thing, more for me!

 

[Horsa]

In that case, please post some x-rays.

Lol. You know what I mean. I mean truly beautiful women aren't just good to look at but they're kind, polite, have a nice manner & voice, maybe they can sing & write poetry too as well as have interesting conversations & a laugh. :0)

 

[Horsa]

Lol! I’m not telling you what you’re trying to do. That is what you did. How else can this sentence be explained.

“I don’t like it if men notice I’m top-heavy so why is it o.k. for women to think a man has a nice posterior?”

Odd that you think you’re standing up for your gender by imposing your preferences but each to their own. If some guys get a tickle from women’s personalities without caring about their looks that’s ok with me. I’m not bothered I have my own thing, more for me!

Lol! I didn't. That can be explained quite easily. We see things our way & only understand other people's views by other people telling us about it or reading about it in books. I'm still quite old school when it comes to certain bodily parts being taboo subjects. I can't understand women who think that it is o.k. to say a man has a nice rear (& think that because of them ladies who want to be taken seriously in other ways find it very hard) in the same way that I can't understand men who think it's o.k. to just talk about a ladies top half. Maybe I phrased what I wanted to say wrong. Maybe I am normally good with words but that doesn't necessarily mean that I'm never stuck for words. Everyone is.

I don't think that I'm imposing my preferences at all. Maybe I would have been better off standing up for my gender by saying something like "women are more than just looks as can be seen by the fact that Charlotte Bronte's 1st novel Jane Eyre which she wrote under the pseudonym of Currer Bell & got published by Smith, Elder & Co. in 1847 was seen by William Makepeace Thackeray as the masterpiece of a literary genius & the fact that Elizabeth Barrett Browning was a very good poet & Marie Curie discovered radium & there are a lot of good women singers". Everyone has their own tastes & the right to have them. I'm not saying men shouldn't care about looks but that looks are only part of the package. Women have voices, thoughts, feelings & opinions too. :0)

 

[Federberg]

Lol! I didn't. That can be explained quite easily. We see things our way & only understand other people's views by other people telling us about it or reading about it in books. I'm still quite old school when it comes to certain bodily parts being taboo subjects. I can't understand women who think that it is o.k. to say a man has a nice rear (& think that because of them ladies who want to be taken seriously in other ways find it very hard) in the same way that I can't understand men who think it's o.k. to just talk about a ladies top half. Maybe I phrased what I wanted to say wrong. Maybe I am normally good with words but that doesn't necessarily mean that I'm never stuck for words. Everyone is.

I don't think that I'm imposing my preferences at all. Maybe I would have been better off standing up for my gender by saying something like "women are more than just looks as can be seen by the fact that Charlotte Bronte's 1st novel Jane Eyre which she wrote under the pseudonym of Currer Bell & got published by Smith, Elder & Co. in 1847 was seen by William Makepeace Thackeray as the masterpiece of a literary genius & the fact that Elizabeth Barrett Browning was a very good poet & Marie Curie discovered radium & there are a lot of good women singers". Everyone has their own tastes & the right to have them. I'm not saying men shouldn't care about looks but that looks are only part of the package. Women have voices, thoughts, feelings & opinions too. :0)

I don’t understand are you actually denying writing what I copied from your post or are you retracting it?

 

[Horsa]

I don’t understand are you actually denying writing what I copied from your post or are you retracting it?

Neither. I'm saying that when I wrote it I didn't exactly communicate what I wanted to say in a way that did credit to what I really thought & I allowed my feelings on the matter to cloud clear communication of my thoughts. Maybe I used the wrong phraseology & as a result my intentions were mis-interpreted.

 

[Federberg]

Neither. I'm saying that when I wrote it I didn't exactly communicate what I wanted to say in a way that did credit to what I really thought & I allowed my feelings on the matter to cloud clear communication of my thoughts. Maybe I used the wrong phraseology & as a result my intentions were mis-interpreted.

You’ve lost me now

 

[Horsa]

You’ve lost me now

I don't understand why. I'm writing in plain English which is the language you write in. I was neither denying that I said what you copied from me (I know I said it) or retracting it. I was saying that when I wrote it I didn't exactly phrase it in the way which would allow my thoughts, opinions & intentions to be interpreted correctly partially because I allowed feelings to cloud my judgement. I'm normally a very articulate person & you're a highly intelligent gentleman so I don't understand why you don't understand me.

 

[Federberg]

I don't understand why. I'm writing in plain English which is the language you write in. I was neither denying that I said what you copied from me (I know I said it) or retracting it. I was saying that when I wrote it I didn't exactly phrase it in the way which would allow my thoughts, opinions & intentions to be interpreted correctly partially because I allowed feelings to cloud my judgement. I'm normally a very articulate person & you're a highly intelligent gentleman so I don't understand why you don't understand me.

lol! we could go around in circles with this. But the simple fact is that every other thing you've said on this matter supports the comment of yours I copied. So I don't understand how your thoughts and opinions were misrepresented for just that one sentence. Anyway... what was a fun topic is no longer that. So let's agree to table this and move on

 

[britbox]

A picture is worth 1000 words. We need more pictures in this thread.

Here is Cilic's new wife.

 

[Horsa]

lol! we could go around in circles with this. But the simple fact is that every other thing you've said on this matter supports the comment of yours I copied. So I don't understand how your thoughts and opinions were misrepresented for just that one sentence. Anyway... what was a fun topic is no longer that. So let's agree to table this and move on

Lol. I don't think so. I'm very sorry. I never meant to offend anyone. I thought that you were trying to make women out as stupid. I've moved on from the times when women were just seen for looks & men too. I know you hate me for being Little Miss Prim & Proper but I was always taught to think about people as a whole & not to mention certain things. I know it may seem contradictory that I think women should be seen as a whole which is the new way of seeing things but still cling to old ways when it comes to conscience. I work spontaneously so guess I took a more open-minded view on people as an old package but not where conscience is concerned so maybe need to challenge these long-held views. Mind you, I'm just a stupid woman anyway so it doesn't really matter what I think. Oops! I forgot! I don't think. I'm very sorry for spoiling everyone's fun. O.K. We'll start anew & move on.

 

[Horsa]

Here is Cilic's new wife.

They look made for each other. I hope they're very happy together.

 

[isabelle]

congrats to Marin and wife, hope they'll have a ton of babies

 

[GameSetAndMath]

Equal Opportunity Photos . Everybody gets something. Not restricted to GFs or Tennis though. Dedicated to athletic form, Not porn.

 

[Horsa]

I'd just like to say I'm very sorry for my outburst the other day. I knew you were defining beauty in the most simplistic way of defining beauty as in something that's aesthetically pleasing. I felt patronised by what Federberg said & the fact women were just being seen as fancy-pieces but expressed myself the wrong way. (He had a point though *women shouldn't really have an opinion on what an attractive woman looks like*). If I'd have just given a few examples of women who were known for something other than looks like Celine Dion for her voice & Charlotte Bronte, Elizabeth Barratt Browning, Emily Bronte (for their works in literature) & Marie Curie (for her work in science) & just left it at that instead of droning on & spoiling everyone's fun it wouldn't have been so bad but I allowed the adrenaline response to take over & acted like an idiot + I'm triskaidecophobic so was worried about what was going to go wrong with it being the 13th. (If he really wanted to keep me in check, he could have easily said something for which I had no answer to). I didn't realise you were just having fun. I'm very sorry. I never meant to upset or offend anyone. When I'm wrong I say I'm wrong & apologise though it may take me time to build up the courage & find the right words as I find it hard.

 

[JesuslookslikeBorg]

surely they all have tiny arses.

a thin female that hardly ever eats any food is not gonna have a big bottom.

 

[Horsa]

surely they all have tiny arses.

a thin female that hardly ever eats any food is not gonna have a big bottom.

Not all thin women hardly eat. Some thin women are thin because they have a fat metabolism & others are thin because they eat sensibly &/ do a lot of exercise. Lol. At 1 time people thought I didn't eat much yet I ate like a pig, hardly did any exercise & never put weight on. I can't get away with that now.

 

[GameSetAndMath]

I'd just like to say I'm very sorry for my outburst the other day. I knew you were defining beauty in the most simplistic way of defining beauty as in something that's aesthetically pleasing. I felt patronised by what Federberg said & the fact women were just being seen as fancy-pieces but expressed myself the wrong way. (He had a point though *women shouldn't really have an opinion on what an attractive woman looks like*). If I'd have just given a few examples of women who were known for something other than looks like Celine Dion for her voice & Charlotte Bronte, Elizabeth Barratt Browning, Emily Bronte (for their works in literature) & Marie Curie (for her work in science) & just left it at that instead of droning on & spoiling everyone's fun it wouldn't have been so bad but I allowed the adrenaline response to take over & acted like an idiot + I'm triskaidecophobic so was worried about what was going to go wrong with it being the 13th. (If he really wanted to keep me in check, he could have easily said something for which I had no answer to). I didn't realise you were just having fun. I'm very sorry. I never meant to upset or offend anyone. When I'm wrong I say I'm wrong & apologise though it may take me time to build up the courage & find the right words as I find it hard.

He did not quite have a point. There are certain circumstances (LGBT) where women's opinion of an attractive woman matters.

 

[Horsa]

He did not quite have a point. There are certain circumstances (LGBT) where women's opinion of an attractive woman matters.

Well, yeah! Lesbians like other women & not only that. Women sometimes like to make ourselves look attractive even if it's just to make ourselves feel good so our opinion matters. Examples of this is when we decide to put make-up on or do nail-art on ourselves or when we get dressed up for a night out. (I do this too.) In my case, gold, glittery, yellow & purple eye-shadows look nice on me & red, orange, purple & pink lipsticks & I do everything from a simple nail varnish job, French manicure, nail wraps & stickers to nail varnish, glitter & nail gems or studs. I don't do false nails that often as they don't stay on.