brokenshoelace
Grand Slam Champion
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 9,380
- Reactions
- 1,334
- Points
- 113
Broken_Shoelace said:I can't really tell if Nadal2005 is just a good troll or, you know...
NADAL2005RG said:Front242 said:NADAL2005RG said:Front242 said:Endlessly dominant? He's dominant in 2013 yes, but I could cite lots of times when he wasn't but what's the point.
Nadal is the only man ever to win slams for 9 years in a row. And the streak appears to have plenty more years left.
I dunno, to me dominant means winning where no one stands a chance not 9-7 in the 5th. I mean I'd hardly say Fed dominated everyone he played last year at Wimbledon either, 'cos frankly he didn't. He won the title but he wasn't dominant.
I dunno, Nadal was limping during the first half of 2013, as he was feeling recovery pains. He didn't fully recover until after Wimbledon. Roland Garros 2013 was just a bonus slam. Nadal in his current physical form would absolutely have wrapped that semi up in 3 or 4 sets. His movement is way better right now than during the clay season.
Front242 said:Yeah that was pretty embarrassing for him and tough. It's totally different in the WTA though, look at Date-Krumm.
DarthFed said:NADAL2005RG said:I dunno, Nadal was limping during the first half of 2013, as he was feeling recovery pains. He didn't fully recover until after Wimbledon. Roland Garros 2013 was just a bonus slam. Nadal in his current physical form would absolutely have wrapped that semi up in 3 or 4 sets. His movement is way better right now than during the clay season.
I haven't seen Wafa limp at all this year aside from the 3rd set of Wimbledon when he was getting his ass kicked by Marcy Darcy's husband.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OHRxSOY9bIU/UY3clv5t61I/AAAAAAAADGA/vaQ93izsTZc/s1600/Garrison5.jpg
Nadal and Federer usually don't play each other until the semifinals and finals of tournaments, but the Indian Wells draw pitted them against each other in their earliest meeting since a third-round match at Miami nine years ago.
"You miss these moments this whole time, but play against Roger in any moment in any situation is special," Nadal said.
Nadal returned to the tour a month ago, winning two of three tournaments on clay after missing seven months because of a left knee injury. He had his knee wrapped and at times appeared to have a slight limp.
Kieran said:It might even be tougher, let's face it, Sod is up against it, but players retire for a reason. They've chosen to walk away, usually after falling out of love with the sport a long time before they retire. Injury is enforced absence. Do you believe Rafa lost any hunger for the sport in his absence?
britbox said:Safin couldn't do it either - he was struggling to make the top 20 for a few years before he retired. I don't think any of them could. They retired because they were done.
Fiero425 said:britbox said:Safin couldn't do it either - he was struggling to make the top 20 for a few years before he retired. I don't think any of them could. They retired because they were done.
At his best, Safin could embarrass anyone; including Sampras! He may have struggled at time, but his problem was between the ears! Same with his sister, Safina!
JesuslookslikeBorg. said:safin retired nearly 4 years ago and now he is 33.
if he couldn't be bothered to train properly in his 20s its not going to be happening now. :nono
there is more chance of seeing a load of gooses flying backwards than there is of safin coming back.
Fiero425 said:britbox said:Safin couldn't do it either - he was struggling to make the top 20 for a few years before he retired. I don't think any of them could. They retired because they were done.
At his best, Safin could embarrass anyone; including Sampras! He may have struggled at time, but his problem was between the ears! Same with his sister, Safina! I'll take Safin's game over Rafa's "ugly" one anytime! Watching Darcis take him out of Wimbledon; such a fake! He was ok as long as he was winning points! The limping only occurred with the misses; he's so "FOS!"
Moxie629 said:Fiero425 said:britbox said:Safin couldn't do it either - he was struggling to make the top 20 for a few years before he retired. I don't think any of them could. They retired because they were done.
At his best, Safin could embarrass anyone; including Sampras! He may have struggled at time, but his problem was between the ears! Same with his sister, Safina! I'll take Safin's game over Rafa's "ugly" one anytime! Watching Darcis take him out of Wimbledon; such a fake! He was ok as long as he was winning points! The limping only occurred with the misses; he's so "FOS!"
Safin was the guy that brought me back to being a full-time tennis fan. He had really a diverse game, power and deftness. He was the beginning of, and, I think, still is the gold-standard for Big Man tennis. And he was, of course, quite the character. I got hooked on Rafa's game, and took the kid on as my back-up...because, let's face it: if you were a fan of Safin, you needed a back-up. To me, they both have/had thrilling games, and enormous amounts of charisma.
Fiero, I know you don't like Rafa's game; it's your prerogative to find it ugly (taste issue,) but I think it goes a bit far to call him a "fake." Safin, while I love him, was actually sanctioned for tanking, (fair or not.) Nadal has had clear injuries issues over the years, but I don't think anyone would call him a "quitter." Like who you like, but consider a few things in terms of glass houses and stones before you disparage a player, when you revere another.