^To be honest it seems to me you're revealing a lack of sporting knowledge. Opponents learned over time how to contend with Novak, there's nothing unusual about that. pre-2011 Novak was not the same as 2011 Novak, he was able to go on that impressive streak and his opposition didn't quite know yet how to counter him. In 2015 he was a better player but his opposition got better too. Despite that Novak went on one of the most dominant slam runs in history. He became a seasoned number one. He lost only one of the 6 slams from AO15 onwards. I don't disagree that his 2011 was more impressive by the numbers. But Stan stopping him,
and the way he played, was more impressive to me than Roger stopping his streak. As exciting as that match was for Roger, I found Stan's performance more impressive. Frankly Roger had to hang on in that match, it was small margins in the end. Nothing of the sort for Stan, he won that match running away. He beat the tar off Novak. That's great sporting entertainment to me. Something I never saw coming, hence that match sticks in my mind more. I have no problem with you disagreeing, it's a matter of taste. What I don't understand is why you seem all burnt up about me disagreeing