britbox
Multiple Major Winner
I can’t take these videos seriously, because in the first few minutes alone, there are context problems. For example, the excerpt from the Stephen Colbert/Bill Gates interview is taken way out of context. Here’s the original, full interview on YouTube. The relevant section begins around 2:45.
This is simply Colbert asking Gates to make a prediction. Yes, he predicts bioterrorism, but it’s just that — a prediction. His other point is that the “work” he cites being done for covid-19 will help in future pandemics. To say there will be future pandemics is not evidence of a plot to initiate one. And he certainly wasn’t the only person to realize it wasn’t a matter of if, but when there would be a pandemic. They’ve happened before, and they’ll happen again. That’s the nature of viruses.
Another example is the statement “Prince Charles threatened the world that unless we accept their great reset there will be more and more pandemics” — except he doesn’t say anything about a great reset. Here’s the entirety of what they quote:
”Unless we take the action necessary and we build again in a greener, more sustainable and more inclusive way then we will end up having more and more pandemics and more and more disasters from ever accelerating global warming and climate change.”
That’s not a threat, that’s a prediction. Telling people in California to buy fire extinguishers in order to be prepared for the next wildfire isn’t a threat to start a wildfire.
There’s a fundamental problem with people passing off predictions and warnings as factual evidence of what happens. We can safely and accurately predict right now that the earth will be hit by another extinction-level asteroid at some point in the future. Again, it’s not a matter of if, but when. It has happened several times before, and unless we develop a way to stop it, it will happen again. If tomorrow such an asteroid is discovered, that doesn’t mean I was part of a conspiracy to hurl an asteroid at Earth.
They are snapshots, but if you want a much bigger context then go into the longer history of the people saying these things.
However, I suggest it's better to focus on the predictable outcomes. Hyperinflation, Controlling population behaviour, food supply, energy... then going back to the original policy documents and seeing the correlation. It's creative destruction. Order out of chaos.
Does the world need a reset of some kind? Absolutely. A predatory capitalist free market eats itself. We're at the end of a cycle. However, if you think these chaps want 8 billion people hanging around for the new world they envisage, then I'd dig deeper, and widen the context much further.