There was no sarcasm in that remark. You are the most humorless bastard on these forums, and the least ironic. (Except when you don't mean to be, and that's just the rest of us snickering behind our hands at you.) It was just flat-out bullshit, and I called you on it, so you plead "sarcasm."
Your definition of “humorless” is, again, self-serving, just as your definition of “black” is. For you, having humor means sharing your prejudices. If someone, for example, makes fun of Cuomo for sending COVID patients into nursing homes (which are really the only places where the virus is a significant danger), or of Democrats for harassing people about the need for social distancing before engaging for days in mass protests/riot-fests once their mood changes, or of Federturd for making the idiotic remark that John Bolton is an “arch-conservative,” you will not find that funny. But again, that is simply a matter of what your prejudices are.
As for the remark about Tara Reade, trust me, I remember very well your absolutely hypocritical stance on that question. I did not misremember anything. I remember you saying that despite all the evidence against Biden in this case, you would get behind Biden because you believe many of the evidence-free allegations against Trump and whatever it takes to defeat Trump, you’ll support. You made your hypocrisy completely clear. I knew where you stood. I could see that you had reversed yourself entirely from the position taken during the Kavanaugh battle just a year and a half prior. We could all see that.
You'll say anything you like to favor your argument, however fallacious, you spineless worm, and then just hope you get away with it, in the flurry of the rest of your quoting other people, rather than having an opinion of your own.
Lol.....this is quite rich coming from someone who has been repeating the Democratic Party cult line every year of her life the last 20 years, and as someone who has never called out Federturd for posting CNN and Atlantic links constantly, with nothing else accompanying them. When I post links, I usually have my own analysis accompanying it, whereas Federturd posts the links either by themselves or with little else attached. Of course, you never have a problem with it because you agree with the garbage links that Federturd posts. Not to mention that you have criticized me for making my posts too long, while being able to say in the next breath that I am not typing enough of my own message or hypocritically accusing me of not responding in full to everything that is said to me (while you constantly ignore inconvenient information for your case that others post).
Also, it is quite funny to see you talk about me posting links when Federturd has stooped so low as to cite David Frum. Despite all your railing against George Bush and the Iraq war for years, you never once called Federturd out for this, not even a single time. That’s because you are not consistent, to put it mildly.
As a final point, one reason that I post links is because I understand how low-information and underexposed to basic information you and other Democrats are. There is so much going on in the world that you guys are unaware of. I am just trying to help you stay up to speed because I know how much your media sources keep you in the dark. Did you know about the two black Chicago cops recently shooting a white man? No. Did you know about the Somali cop in Minneapolis killing a white woman in 2017? No. So I was just bringing these things to your attention, knowing that you had never heard of those stories. Part of the reason I post links is to enlighten the ignorant. Another part of the reason is that I know you and others have absolutely zero exposure to right-wing media.
Of course, I understand that one reason you are objecting to me posting links is that you had nothing to say to refute Heather MacDonald, who is a far more knowledgeable and rational woman than you are. The truths she pointed out pissed you off, so you ignored them, just as you ignored the contents of the videos and tweets that Carol and I recently posted.
What do you say you let people define themselves for a change?
Lmfao.....like you do with black people, who for you are nothing more than predesigned characters in a political morality play?
Your definition of “black” is limited to one thing and one thing only: left-wing political activism and ideological victimhood aligned with the Democratic Party. There is absolutely nothing else to blackness in your one-dimensional, one-track view of race and life overall.
Speaking of irony, I would like to thank you, in the spirit of friendly dialogue, for addressing my points about Robert E Lee being revered for generations by numerous prominent Americans, including both Presidents Roosevelt, who were each from New York. I would also like to thank you for admitting that the Democratic governors were complete morons for allowing Covid patients into nursing homes, and for acknowledging that your stupid ideas have reigned supreme for over half a century in Democrat-run cities with little to show for blacks, except the race-hustling left-wing activist class that has been empowered through your efforts while the black masses have had their communities destroyed in city after city.
Thanks also for addressing all the points made by Heather MacDonald about race, crime, and policing. I’m sure that with your profound sense of irony, you will know that my gratitude is heartfelt in this case.
Now why don’t you focus on substance for a change? You’re not very good at it. You should drop the preaching and trying to sticking to substance.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
www.nbcphiladelphia.com
justthenews.com
