Moxie629 said:
GameSetAndMath said:
Moxie629 said:
GameSetAndMath said:
Moxie629 said:
I'm liking the above from you, Iona, for so many reasons. DO come to NY! What a wash-out of a day for the fans. I saw exactly 3 games of one match (DelPotro v. GG Lopez) before we finally gave up. I've never before seen a drop of rain in all my years of going to the Open, so clearly I've been lucky up until today. I cannot figure out how the USTA (?) decides about scheduling this event, year after year, when it so clearly doesn't work out for them.
Do you get refund/ticket for next day or something like that?
No. I could have gone earlier, and I could still be there watching the matches that are on now. It wasn't a complete wash-out, and I'm not sure what happens, in that case.
I'll say this about the scheduling: HOW can there be women through to the 3rd round when no men are, and some men still have to get to the second? They could front-load the first two days with men's matches, at least to get them through. The men really deserve the two-day rest, whereas the women are playing the same format they play in one-week events. Dumb, dumb, dumb!!
The scheduling is not as dumb as you think. The women's final is on sunday,
whereas men's final is on monday. So, the women need to finish sooner whereas
men can afford to goof off. That is why men's first round is spread over 3 days,
whereas women's first round is over in 2 days. I think it is logical schedule.
Rain creates havoc; the organizers cannot do anything about it. Let us be
reasonable. The scheduling is fair (even if Murray fans go wild).
Remember that Roger also could not get onto the court for his opening
match the very first night.
I think you miss my main point, GSM. The women play best of 3 at every event of the year, and in most of them they play every day. The men, however, only play best of 5 at Slams, and really need their day off. Therefore, they are at a must greater risk of getting backed up and potentially having to play 2 days in a row, which is unfair. At any point, the women's singles schedule can catch up by having them play 2 days in a row, which is no hardship. That's why, IMO, you need to make a greater effort to keep the men safely on a regular day-off schedule by getting them safely out of the first round first.
I agree with your newer remark. In fact, if you remember, this was exactly Rafa's
argument when he got so unhappy with the scheduling in the FO of this year.
What I was talking about is different. I was talking about general reason of why
the Men's 1st round was being played over three days and not over 2 days. It is
because, Men's event is spread over 15 days and Women's event is spread over
14 days. Also, with Men's matches taking longer time, it makes sense to spread
over the 64 matches over longer period. Finally, spreading the first round over
three days gives more players a chance to see the Centre Court (AA Stadium).
To summarize, without any adverse weather situation, the Schedule of
USO makes perfect senese. Having said that, I would agree that the moment
bad weather kicks in, they should give priority to scheduling of Men's matches
for the very reason you mentioned in your latest response.
That is why, I said it is "not as dumb as you think" as opposed to simply
saying "not dumb". Hope this explains.
p.s. Although I am quoting only Moxie's response, my reply is also a reply to
a bunch of other folks commenting on the same thing.