Serious Question: Could Johnny Mac beat Vika or Serena?

[RJD11]

obviously watching WTA tennis too much would blind their fans, they probably think Serena is better than Federer too

Serena has no weapon to beat JMac, even though he is well into 50s. A match between them would embarrass WTA totally, since some grandpa could easily toy with the supposedly greatest female candidate - that naturally their fans would be forced to admit WTA tennis is not all that good, bad for business. Obviously WTA fans can still live in delusion and denial, as long as WTA player avoid the 'real' matches. Ever wondered why Serena never dared to challenge a rubbish baller like Braasch again? she knows WAY BETTER than you clueless fans that she'd be humiliated.

As for Vika? she is not even as good as Serena, her only chance is to play naked

McEnroe is not Federer. He is an OLD man. Serena serves harder than

than him. It would be a replay of King/Riggs


And I would pay to see that Vika match

Serena can't beat JMac, get over it. Riggs beat Court easily, you think King won a real match? Court was better than King, and people back then knew Riggs made money by betting..... think about the odds he'd have by throwing it to King. Court was considered fav against Rigg, but after that match Rigg was the fav vs King.

I've seen Serena and JMac playing live, JMac is just way better.

So have I and .....no way

As to Riggs throwing the match for a bet..I doubt it

Riggs made a bundle playing the match + endorsements

And bookies are smart guys. No bookie in his right mind

would lay a bet for Riggs against himself.

have you? where did you see old JMac play? because if you did and still make this judgement, you just don't know what tennis is really about. Braasch once said, the Williams have no chance against top 500 male players - so far none of the Williams ever dared to challenge again, even though they said they would when they are ready.

Looks like they'll never get ready, and i think they know the reason - much better than you do. And JMac imo can be as good as a 500th ranked player in any given match.

JMac was my favorite player back in the day. But that day was

long ago. And Braasch was talking about a 16 year old Serena,

not the experienced GOAT Serena of today.

 

[Ricardo]

McEnroe is not Federer. He is an OLD man. Serena serves harder than

than him. It would be a replay of King/Riggs


And I would pay to see that Vika match

Serena can't beat JMac, get over it. Riggs beat Court easily, you think King won a real match? Court was better than King, and people back then knew Riggs made money by betting..... think about the odds he'd have by throwing it to King. Court was considered fav against Rigg, but after that match Rigg was the fav vs King.

I've seen Serena and JMac playing live, JMac is just way better.

So have I and .....no way

As to Riggs throwing the match for a bet..I doubt it

Riggs made a bundle playing the match + endorsements

And bookies are smart guys. No bookie in his right mind

would lay a bet for Riggs against himself.

have you? where did you see old JMac play? because if you did and still make this judgement, you just don't know what tennis is really about. Braasch once said, the Williams have no chance against top 500 male players - so far none of the Williams ever dared to challenge again, even though they said they would when they are ready.

Looks like they'll never get ready, and i think they know the reason - much better than you do. And JMac imo can be as good as a 500th ranked player in any given match.

JMac was my favorite player back in the day. But that day was

long ago. And Braasch was talking about a 16 year old Serena,

not the experienced GOAT Serena of today.

not giving up are you? i don't care who your fav player was, it's got nothing to do with this. What matters is how you judge from the actions. The Williams sisters were gloating about beating male players, they got thrashed ok we know that, yet they promised to challenge again WHEN THEY ARE READY. Now being well into their 30s, having all the records to show that they've peak and in fact are past their prime, they STILL haven't got it to challenge like they said..... because they are simply not good enough.

The only way for Williams to counter this would be, do what they said and beat the guys..... ever wonder why they still back off with all that 'experience'? the 'experience' must have been painful :laydownlaughing

 

[RJD11]

Serena can't beat JMac, get over it. Riggs beat Court easily, you think King won a real match? Court was better than King, and people back then knew Riggs made money by betting..... think about the odds he'd have by throwing it to King. Court was considered fav against Rigg, but after that match Rigg was the fav vs King.

I've seen Serena and JMac playing live, JMac is just way better.

So have I and .....no way

As to Riggs throwing the match for a bet..I doubt it

Riggs made a bundle playing the match + endorsements

And bookies are smart guys. No bookie in his right mind

would lay a bet for Riggs against himself.

have you? where did you see old JMac play? because if you did and still make this judgement, you just don't know what tennis is really about. Braasch once said, the Williams have no chance against top 500 male players - so far none of the Williams ever dared to challenge again, even though they said they would when they are ready.

Looks like they'll never get ready, and i think they know the reason - much better than you do. And JMac imo can be as good as a 500th ranked player in any given match.

JMac was my favorite player back in the day. But that day was

long ago. And Braasch was talking about a 16 year old Serena,

not the experienced GOAT Serena of today.

not giving up are you? i don't care who your fav player was, it's got nothing to do with this. What matters is how you judge from the actions. The Williams sisters were gloating about beating male players, they got thrashed ok we know that, yet they promised to challenge again WHEN THEY ARE READY. Now being well into their 30s, having all the records to show that they've peak and in fact are past their prime, they STILL haven't got it to challenge like they said..... because they are simply not good enough.

The only way for Williams to counter this would be, do what they said and beat the guys..... ever wonder why they still back off with all that 'experience'? the 'experience' must have been painful :laydownlaughing

What you are talking about is what has nothing to do with this.

The subject is The best Woman player ever against a 55 year old

man who was great a long time past. Not about something 2 Children

might have said 15 years ago.

 

[Ricardo]

So have I and .....no way

As to Riggs throwing the match for a bet..I doubt it

Riggs made a bundle playing the match + endorsements

And bookies are smart guys. No bookie in his right mind

would lay a bet for Riggs against himself.

have you? where did you see old JMac play? because if you did and still make this judgement, you just don't know what tennis is really about. Braasch once said, the Williams have no chance against top 500 male players - so far none of the Williams ever dared to challenge again, even though they said they would when they are ready.

Looks like they'll never get ready, and i think they know the reason - much better than you do. And JMac imo can be as good as a 500th ranked player in any given match.

JMac was my favorite player back in the day. But that day was

long ago. And Braasch was talking about a 16 year old Serena,

not the experienced GOAT Serena of today.

not giving up are you? i don't care who your fav player was, it's got nothing to do with this. What matters is how you judge from the actions. The Williams sisters were gloating about beating male players, they got thrashed ok we know that, yet they promised to challenge again WHEN THEY ARE READY. Now being well into their 30s, having all the records to show that they've peak and in fact are past their prime, they STILL haven't got it to challenge like they said..... because they are simply not good enough.

The only way for Williams to counter this would be, do what they said and beat the guys..... ever wonder why they still back off with all that 'experience'? the 'experience' must have been painful :laydownlaughing

What you are talking about is what has nothing to do with this.

The subject is The best Woman player ever against a 55 year old

man who was great a long time past. Not about something 2 Children

might have said 15 years ago.

two things, best woman ever is still debatable. Also that 55 yo man is not any other man but one of the very true genius to ever play the game, and he happens to be in really good shape for his age.

He is still better than Serena, and she knows this. Serena is very smart playing the waiting game, when John can no longer run then its time to challenge (at his age it can happen quickly, while she has plenty of time to slowly slow down).

 

[RJD11]

have you? where did you see old JMac play? because if you did and still make this judgement, you just don't know what tennis is really about. Braasch once said, the Williams have no chance against top 500 male players - so far none of the Williams ever dared to challenge again, even though they said they would when they are ready.

Looks like they'll never get ready, and i think they know the reason - much better than you do. And JMac imo can be as good as a 500th ranked player in any given match.

JMac was my favorite player back in the day. But that day was

long ago. And Braasch was talking about a 16 year old Serena,

not the experienced GOAT Serena of today.

not giving up are you? i don't care who your fav player was, it's got nothing to do with this. What matters is how you judge from the actions. The Williams sisters were gloating about beating male players, they got thrashed ok we know that, yet they promised to challenge again WHEN THEY ARE READY. Now being well into their 30s, having all the records to show that they've peak and in fact are past their prime, they STILL haven't got it to challenge like they said..... because they are simply not good enough.

The only way for Williams to counter this would be, do what they said and beat the guys..... ever wonder why they still back off with all that 'experience'? the 'experience' must have been painful :laydownlaughing

What you are talking about is what has nothing to do with this.

The subject is The best Woman player ever against a 55 year old

man who was great a long time past. Not about something 2 Children

might have said 15 years ago.

two things, best woman ever is still debatable. Also that 55 yo man is not any other man but one of the very true genius to ever play the game, and he happens to be in really good shape for his age.

He is still better than Serena, and she knows this. Serena is very smart playing the waiting game, when John can no longer run then its time to challenge (at his age it can happen quickly, while she has plenty of time to slowly slow down).

Best woman ever may be debatable to you. And that's okay.

IMO She is The Most Talented Female Tennis Player Ever.


But that old man is still an old man who can't do the things

he used to do. If he could I would agree with you. That he

is better than Serena now is your opinion and very debatable,

which is what we were doing.

They have not played so we are both stating our opinions

You stating yours emphatically does not make it a fact.


And I agree that JMac is in good shape for his age and

if they played 1 set ........ maybe. But in a real tennis

match, playing seriously, ( not one of those Exo jokefests )

I think Serena would win.