Serious PC thread

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,349
Reactions
7,592
Points
113
The Telegraph is behind a paywall but this story can be also found on MSN:

IMG_7435.jpeg


‘An “insult” to strong women’, indeed.

From MSN:

The claim is part of a broader effort within the curriculum to provide historical and cultural context for LGBTQ+ identities. The lesson plan suggests discussing references to non-binary people in ancient Mesopotamia, the legally recognised hijra gender in South Asia, and the suggestion that Joan of Arc might be viewed through a non-binary lens. However, some teachers have expressed frustration, arguing that such content detracts from the study of literary classics and prioritises ideology over traditional academic subjects. One teacher remarked that the lesson plan “makes an absolute mockery of the profession” and suggested that contemporary identity-focused material is being promoted at the expense of established literature such as To Kill a Mockingbird and Of Mice and Men.

Of course it’s a mockery of the teaching profession. So are the people pushing this, who probably never encountered a book they didn’t try to corrupt. “Of Mice and Men” might become “Of Mice and Transmen and Brian and Ben”, and “To Kill a Mockingbird” is being reworked according to the authors unstated but very clear intentions to be now called “To Kill a White Cis Male.”

:facepalm:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Federberg

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,742
Reactions
5,795
Points
113
The Telegraph is behind a paywall but this story can be also found on MSN:

View attachment 10017

‘An “insult” to strong women’, indeed.

From MSN:



Of course it’s a mockery of the teaching profession. So are the people pushing this, who probably never encountered a book they didn’t try to corrupt. “Of Mice and Men” might become “Of Mice and Transmen and Brian and Ben”, and “To Kill a Mockingbird” is being reworked according to the authors unstated but very clear intentions to be now called “To Kill a White Cis Male.”

:facepalm:
have you noticed that a certain type of feminist tends to be the strongest advocate for this trans ideology. Actively disadvantaging women. I honestly don't understand it. Either they're as dumb as fuck or there's some deeper agenda. Perhaps their hatred of men is so deep they want to eradicate the species?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kieran

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,349
Reactions
7,592
Points
113
have you noticed that a certain type of feminist tends to be the strongest advocate for this trans ideology. Actively disadvantaging women. I honestly don't understand it. Either they're as dumb as fuck or there's some deeper agenda. Perhaps their hatred of men is so deep they want to eradicate the species?
I tend to think now that the only real feminists among women are the ones slagged off as being TERFs. Any woman who gives even the slightest credence to this shit but still calls themselves a feminist has obviously been co-opted…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Federberg

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,742
Reactions
5,795
Points
113
this woman talked about this issue 13years ago. 13 years! And it's worse now...

 
  • Like
Reactions: Kieran

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,349
Reactions
7,592
Points
113
A real life example of the terror people face for asking sensible questions that might help them know if they are safe (from the Beeb):

Footballer banned for trans comment wants FA apology

This is what life was like under the most oppressive communist regimes in Europe. You must follow the diktats of dishonest tyrants or suffer. And now it happens in the UK to children:

Last year, Cerys Vaughan, then aged 17, was sanctioned by an FA disciplinary commission for improper conduct after she asked the rival player if they were a man during a friendly match.

Having been told the player was transgender, Vaughan says she then raised the matter with the referee over concerns she had about fairness and safety.

Following a complaint, she was charged with a breach of FA rules, and after a hearing she was handed a six-match ban, four of which were suspended.

Now, I get it that when people identify as the opposite sex there’s a potent contagion at work, the need to announce your pronouns as “Me Me Me” has standing among the crybullies, but there’s also a contagion at work in the legal system that supports this addiction to public posturing.

The case has since been dropped after the complainant withdrew from the process.

Vaughan, now 18, has chosen to reveal her identity and in her first broadcast interview told BBC Sport: "It was stressful. It's definitely impacted my normal life a lot.

There are people who might have sympathy for the complainant, but they’d be wrong to. Bullying a concerned young girl for asking a proper and sensible question is not what feminism is: feminism is not about protecting men who would abuse young girls…
 

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,742
Reactions
5,795
Points
113
This is an incredible debate. Here we have this dumb fool interviewing Candace Owens, and the subject goes to trans. This dude is willing to give more validity to a trans-woman than to Rachel Dolziel. That's the white woman who identifies as black. Bear in mind that a large number of whites in America actually have black genes. But somehow her identifying as black is what.. cultural or racial appropriation, but some dude can wake up and feel like a woman? Fuck outta here...

 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T World Affairs 13
britbox World Affairs 88
britbox World Affairs 1023
britbox World Affairs 9205