mrzz
Hater
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 6,333
- Reactions
- 3,255
- Points
- 113
Ok, for me Federer x Monfils is always completely in Federer's raquect. Contrary to the majority here, I do not see much in Monfils, appart from his obivous physical capacities and a trick shot here and there. All times that Federer lost to him, he played simply like crap. He would have been beaten by virtually any top 50, even 100, on those days. He even played like crap at the USO and managed to win.
I am not too impressed with Federer's level untill now, but if he plays like he played in Rome, for example, he should win well. A full flight Federer, which is a rare sight these days, would straight set Monfils under two hours.
I am not too impressed with Federer's level untill now, but if he plays like he played in Rome, for example, he should win well. A full flight Federer, which is a rare sight these days, would straight set Monfils under two hours.