Roger Federer Announces Retirement

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,139
Reactions
7,410
Points
113
One thing with the Roger retirement and the timing of the announcement, even if he feels he can’t play Basle, why not delay the announcement to help the ticket sales for that event, and have his big moment there?

Is it because financially he owns part of the Laver Cup and so he prefers to boost that?

It’s probably a slightly cynical thought but these lads are no fools and they know the impact of the moment on the tournament they choose to retire at…
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,139
Reactions
7,410
Points
113
I just saw this on Facebook:
Severin Luthi about Roger Federer's retirement:

He just did not make enough progress. He's 41, been on the tour for so long, he's played over 1500 matches. His retirement is a combination of these factors. Roger makes it easy for us. Of course, it was an emotional decision for him. Otherwise, he would never have been able to achieve so much at this level. There's a lot of passion behind it. But he is always so positive about everything.

It would be harder for me if he was totally devastated. How he processes the whole thing helps me, too. Roger has called me two or three times today to ask how I'm doing. He's always thinking about the others, too. He's fine, he's with his family.

I think we should now focus not only on the end of his career but above all on everything he achieved. All these beautiful successes. People should not only be sad but also happy about all the things they could experience with Roger.

About the Laver Cup: «He will try to play. Whether that's in singles or doubles, we'll see. He wants to be on the team and try to play. Roger doesn't want to put himself above the Laver Cup. But I think the reactions will be overwhelming. There will be chicken skin moments.

His best memories: «Spontaneously, I would say the last Wimbledon title (2017), his comeback in Australia (2017) when nobody expected him to win, the Davis Cup victory in Lille (2014), and Olympic gold in doubles with Stan Wawrinka (2008 in Beijing). And Paris (2009).

His legacy? «I think many will remember him primarily as a nice person. That's more important than if you won one title more or less. His kindness, how he behaved towards the other players. Roger has contributed to the fact that players treat each other with more respect.»

He talks to everyone in the dressing room. It doesn't matter who it is. He's all about the person. Sure, his successes won't be forgotten soon. But I think the human aspect is even more important. What I also find very positive: knowing he won't turn his back on tennis.

Via Simon Graf (@SimonGraf1)
 

TheSicilian

Pro Tour Champion
Joined
Sep 12, 2021
Messages
488
Reactions
592
Points
93
One thing with the Roger retirement and the timing of the announcement, even if he feels he can’t play Basle, why not delay the announcement to help the ticket sales for that event, and have his big moment there?

Is it because financially he owns part of the Laver Cup and so he prefers to boost that?

It’s probably a slightly cynical thought but these lads are no fools and they know the impact of the moment on the tournament they choose to retire at…
I doubt the Laver cup needed any extra help to sell tickets, having the big 3 playing would probably be enough to sell out any arena anywhere in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kieran

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
47,100
Reactions
31,018
Points
113
I doubt the Laver cup needed any extra help to sell tickets, having the big 3 playing would probably be enough to sell out any arena anywhere in the world.
I believe the tickets are very expensive, still having the Big 3 playing and Federer retiring, once in a lifetime chance for any tennis fan.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

Moxie

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
43,818
Reactions
14,976
Points
113
I doubt the Laver cup needed any extra help to sell tickets, having the big 3 playing would probably be enough to sell out any arena anywhere in the world.
Yes, but it is very close to his heart. I know it makes him money, but he set it up to honor The Rocket, and the tournament itself is part of his legacy.
 

don_fabio

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
May 2, 2019
Messages
4,423
Reactions
4,870
Points
113
If we slice Roger's career in half and let's say compare his slam wins in two decades, which are 00s and 10s, then we come to the numbers of 15 slams in 00s and 5 slams in 10s. For me Roger was better than only 5 slams in a latter decade. Had it not been for his late renaissance in 2017 and 2018 that number would be even lower, but with 2017 and 2018 where he won 3 slams it levels a bit more. Still it is 75 to 25 percent in a favor of first decade.

More realistic would be 7-8 slams in a 2nd decade in my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

TheSicilian

Pro Tour Champion
Joined
Sep 12, 2021
Messages
488
Reactions
592
Points
93
Yes, but it is very close to his heart. I know it makes him money, but he set it up to honor The Rocket, and the tournament itself is part of his legacy.
How much $$$$ does he need ;) But it's good he set it up to honor a tennis legend!
 

kskate2

Administrator
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
31,117
Reactions
10,160
Points
113
Age
55
Location
Tampa Bay
For all the Frontier Fed fans I am posting pics I took when I went to the USO and Laver Cup a few years back. :rose:

IMG_0996.PNG


ESPN Desk w/ Chris McHendry and Mac
IMG_0968.jpg

IMG_0970.jpg

IMG_0971.jpg

IMG_0972.jpg

IMG_0973.jpg

IMG_0974.jpg

IMG_0975.jpg

IMG_0976.jpg

IMG_0977.jpg


Laver Cup in Chicago a few weeks later
IMG_7315.PNG

IMG_7316.PNG


Fed & Zed doubs
IMG_7313.PNG

IMG_7314.PNG
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,280
Reactions
6,021
Points
113
If we slice Roger's career in half and let's say compare his slam wins in two decades, which are 00s and 10s, then we come to the numbers of 15 slams in 00s and 5 slams in 10s. For me Roger was better than only 5 slams in a latter decade. Had it not been for his late renaissance in 2017 and 2018 that number would be even lower, but with 2017 and 2018 where he won 3 slams it levels a bit more. Still it is 75 to 25 percent in a favor of first decade.

More realistic would be 7-8 slams in a 2nd decade in my opinion.
Well, to be fair, Rafa and Novak had both surpassed him during that second decade. Roger was the best player on tour from late 2003 through 2007, and coeval with Rafa in 2008-09 (Rafa was better but less consistent, so I see them as equals), but by 2010 Rafa had surpassed him, and Novak joined him a year later. So from 2011 on, Roger was the overall 3rd best player in the sport. It was a close 3rd in 2010-12, but by 2013, the distance was greater (and began to struggle with health issues).

2017 was remarkable, because he truly was the best player on tour - only finishing behind Rafa because he played an abbreviated schedule. But even then, we have to accept that his ascendancy was helped by Novak's struggles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

the AntiPusher

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,019
Reactions
7,144
Points
113
For all the Frontier Fed fans I am posting pics I took when I went to the USO and Laver Cup a few years back. :rose:

View attachment 7201

ESPN Desk w/ Chris McHendry and Mac
View attachment 7202
View attachment 7203
View attachment 7204
View attachment 7205
View attachment 7206
View attachment 7207
View attachment 7208
View attachment 7209
View attachment 7210

Laver Cup in Chicago a few weeks later
View attachment 7211
View attachment 7212

Fed & Zed doubs
View attachment 7213
View attachment 7214
i hope that all avid tennis enthusiasts in the Chicagoland area would have attended that event since pro tennis tournaments (ATP and WTA) left years ago.. Thanks KELI
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: kskate2

the AntiPusher

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,019
Reactions
7,144
Points
113
I saw a news caption that Roger is unsure if he will play in the Laver Cup
 

Ricardo

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
2,674
Reactions
646
Points
113
Well, to be fair, Rafa and Novak had both surpassed him during that second decade. Roger was the best player on tour from late 2003 through 2007, and coeval with Rafa in 2008-09 (Rafa was better but less consistent, so I see them as equals), but by 2010 Rafa had surpassed him, and Novak joined him a year later. So from 2011 on, Roger was the overall 3rd best player in the sport. It was a close 3rd in 2010-12, but by 2013, the distance was greater (and began to struggle with health issues).

2017 was remarkable, because he truly was the best player on tour - only finishing behind Rafa because he played an abbreviated schedule. But even then, we have to accept that his ascendancy was helped by Novak's struggles.
Likewise, Novak’s ascendancy was helped by Federer’s struggles (or Nadals) at certain other times, thus making your statement pointless. Nasal’s struggles allowed Novak to bag the two RG. (And once for Federer). Its vice-versa, all part of the game.
 

El Dude

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
10,280
Reactions
6,021
Points
113
Likewise, Novak’s ascendancy was helped by Federer’s struggles (or Nadals) at certain other times, thus making your statement pointless. Nasal’s struggles allowed Novak to bag the two RG. (And once for Federer). Its vice-versa, all part of the game.
Yes, I realize that. I have often said that these sorts of things tend to even themselves out - usually in response to someone (say, a Rafa fan) saying "If only X, then he would have won at least 5 more Slams."

But what I was saying was part of a larger point in reply to someone talking about the first and second halves of Roger's career: that from about 2010 on, he was the third best player on tour. Winning 5 Slams as the third best player is no small feat.
 

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
47,100
Reactions
31,018
Points
113
I saw a news caption that Roger is unsure if he will play in the Laver Cup
Yes I read that as well, he has had a practice session with The Young Greek today, probably just feeling out the knee, it did become inflamed again., last week.
 

the AntiPusher

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,019
Reactions
7,144
Points
113
Yes I read that as well, he has had a practice session with The Young Greek today, probably just feeling out the knee, it did become inflamed again., last week.
Sounds pretty accurate what you are posting..I don't know how much cartilage Roger has left in his knees. I'm certain that he has tried everything medically he could to remain active on the tennis courts.
 

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
47,100
Reactions
31,018
Points
113
Sounds pretty accurate what you are posting..I don't know how much cartilage Roger has left in his knees. I'm certain that he has tried everything medically he could to remain active on the tennis courts.
Federer has told Swiss press, that his goal is to play doubles on Friday on an acceptable level. He won't play singles.Friday will be his final match as a professional. Quite frankly I dont think Federer intended to play singles at the Laver Cup.
 
Last edited:

the AntiPusher

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,019
Reactions
7,144
Points
113
  • Like
Reactions: tented and Moxie

MargaretMcAleer

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
47,100
Reactions
31,018
Points
113

Ricardo

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
2,674
Reactions
646
Points
113
2017 was remarkable, because he truly was the best player on tour - only finishing behind Rafa because he played an abbreviated schedule. But even then, we have to accept that his ascendancy was helped by Novak's struggles.
see you are putting asterisk to him being the best player in 2017….backhanded acknowledgement it is then. This kind of thing can apply to every other player too, its still just pointless no matter what. And it is not part of any other point, simply has no meaning…..other than implying Novak‘s ‘could’ves’, but without any evidence…..