Luxilon Borg said:
the AntiPusher said:
Moxie629 said:
Front242 said:
Well he (Dolgo) certainly wasn't being toyed with. Nadal definitely benefitted from a lot of slop been thrown at him today compared to the far better performance Dolgo put in against Ferrer. But then again, Nadal was never favoured to lose anyway.
Dolgopolov made too many tactical errors. He's got a game that disrupts everyone's rhythm, and yet he chose to duke it out with Rafa on clay. Critical error. He completely disrupted Ferrer's rhythm, which won him that match. I know it's not as easy to do to Nadal, but it seemed like he'd abandoned that tactic, and chose to go toe-to-toe too often. I know that Rafa could push him back more, with weight of shot, but The Dog needs to learn to be specific about his choices. I really hope that Santoro can foster his quirkiness, but also teach him better strategy. He's SO talented, but he seems to have almost no idea what to do with it.
Well, At least he spared us from another Nadal\Ferrer match up..well, for me he did.. I like the
Do(l)g.. Dolgo is a refreshing change of pace although, I dont think he has the type game that will endured a full two weeks at a slam..
LOL..well said..another predictable Nadal Ferrer match was avoided.
Actually, I tend to think the other way on this occassion. Nadal seemed to have
some physical issues still (recall the SF against Pablo). Whenever, Nadal has some
minor physical issues, Ferrer does a good job of standing his ground and winning
against Nadal, whereas a lesser opponent might still not win against Nadal. This
is because Ferrer can out-grind a Nadal with physical issues.
In that sense, I actually feel that Nadal got luck in Rio that he did not have
to face Ferrer, assuming there was some physical issues that are still lingering.
In general, I agree that Nadal vs. Ferrer match and that too on clay would
be predictable.