I so agree with Gilles Simon on this. People will take two like examples and give them different attributes. Like he said, Gasquet plays deep behind the baseline and it's seen as "talent," but for Nadal it's a "physical style." I think a lot of people simply repeat often repeated phrases and then find common ground. Talent is defined as a special natural ability or aptitude, it has nothing to do with whichever style you prefer. Some players talent is taking the ball early, or carving up the court, even getting to the ball quickly, but this notion that everyone has to play a certain way is beyond idiotic IMO. I have had so many people try to convince that Nadal plays a physical game to the exclusion of everyone else on tour when many players have had many injuries over the years. It's just weird how people think sometimes.
Gilles Simon: 'For people, Gasquet who plays far away from the baseline is talented, while Nadal...'
Gatto Luigi - 26-09-2016 - View: 47143
Tennis - The French player shared his thoughts about what he felt about the concept of talent
http://www.tennisworldusa.org/news/news/Tennis_Interviews/36668/gilles-simon-for-people-gasquet-who-plays-far-away-from-the-baseline-is-talented-while-nadal-/
In a recent interview with L'Equipe, Gilles Simon shared his thoughts about the perception of talent in the tennis world.
Drawing a comparison between compatriot Richard Gasquet and Rafael Nadal, Simon said, 'When Richard Gasquet sends a backhand ten miles from the corner of the stands, they say it's talent. They're right. But when Rafael Nadal does the same with a forehand, they say it's strength and that it's physical. There's complete agreement about Federer's talent, but when it comes to Djokovic, there's doubt. They say he has no great shot. Except that when you serve at him at 275 kph and he takes it every time, in the middle of the racquet. That's incredible talent. If you ask Jan de Witt, who has the most talent, Roger or Novak, he'll hesitate to reply.'
Elaborating further, he said, 'Television distorts perceptions. People don't see what's so special about Kei Nishikori. He has the best two-handed backhand I've ever seen. He finds incredible angles but that doesn't make an impression. I often use the example of Michael Llodra. He had an amazing volley and touch but he couldn't hit a correct forehand. Was he gifted? Safin had a patent on talent his entire career, but when it came to hands, he was like me. Now, Ernests Gulbis is the same. He's talented, full stop. If he loses, it's because he doesn't feel like playing.'
He also mentioned, 'In France, in the beginning, I had the impression that it was better to be less good. With talent that Gulbis who's ranked 50th is more esteemed than a Ferrer who's third. Now, I couldn't care less whether people see if I have talent or not. I usually answer that my talent is my timing. Talent is weighing 70 kg and hitting 50 winners against Rafa in Rome (last year). I hope it doesn't get taken the wrong way, but when I see that they think that I have less talent than Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, it's impressive. Jo hammers every shot. It's very forceful. Between us four, Gael Monfils is the one who has the most talent.'