Indian Wells, BNP Paribas Open, Masters 1000

Horsa

Equine-loving rhyme-artist
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
4,865
Reactions
1,308
Points
113
Location
Britain
please read through the thread properly (and even more importantly the post you're challenging) before making these types of comments :facepalm:
It wasn't really necessary in this case as what I said was very relevant to the comment. Some things can be seen in many different ways as well as in general. I read the comment properly. G.S.M. said it was o.k. to be wrong as long as you weren't wrong loudly. My question was why & I explained why I asked why.
 

Horsa

Equine-loving rhyme-artist
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
4,865
Reactions
1,308
Points
113
Location
Britain
^ I guess you just don't understand me although I'm an extremely grandiloquent & articulate lady as well as being loquacious. We just see things differently although we speak the same language. I guess you just like to pick faults with me (some of which I don't see) & have a problem with me for some reason which you just haven't spoken to me about so I can't solve it.
 

Horsa

Equine-loving rhyme-artist
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
4,865
Reactions
1,308
Points
113
Location
Britain
The ATP H2H is a bit misleading, as it displays the WO matches, but at the same time does not count them. Given the number of matches in Fedal case, it is easy to make an error. A good example of this "inconsistency" is the Monfils x Thiem H2H, 7 matches, 3 wo's, 4x0 Thiem.:

https://www.atptour.com/en/players/fedex-head-2-head/gael-monfils-vs-dominic-thiem/MC65/TB69
O.K. Thank you very much for the information. I can see how it's easy to make a mistake. Mistakes are very easy to make anyway. (I was just generalising earlier because I chose to generalise.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fiero425

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,552
Reactions
5,627
Points
113
^ I guess you just don't understand me although I'm an extremely grandiloquent & articulate lady as well as being loquacious. We just see things differently although we speak the same language. I guess you just like to pick faults with me (some of which I don't see) & have a problem with me for some reason which you just haven't spoken to me about so I can't solve it.
lol! Please don't go down the victimhood route. It's boring and frankly I wouldn't waste my time following you around and trying to pick faults, it's beneath me. You decided to jump in and critique a perfectly valid comment a poster made, without bothering to understand why he made the comment. Trying to be the conscience of the forum and the protector of the victimised might seem worthwhile, but we're all adults here
 

Horsa

Equine-loving rhyme-artist
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
4,865
Reactions
1,308
Points
113
Location
Britain
lol! Please don't go down the victimhood route. It's boring and frankly I wouldn't waste my time following you around and trying to pick faults, it's beneath me. You decided to jump in and critique a perfectly valid comment a poster made, without bothering to understand why he made the comment. Trying to be the conscience of the forum and the protector of the victimised might seem worthwhile, but we're all adults here
Lol. I'm not playing the victim. It doesn't look like you wouldn't waste time following me around & picking faults with me. If it's so boring why are you doing it? (Sarcasm intended.) I know G.S.M. made a valid point but I disagreed with it for the reasons stated. I was answering the comment without thinking about the possible intention behind it. I'm not trying to protect people who are victimised or be anyone's conscience as everyone has their own conscience, (well, I'd hope so, anyway). I understand that we're all adults & that's how I treat people.
 

Horsa

Equine-loving rhyme-artist
Joined
Feb 2, 2016
Messages
4,865
Reactions
1,308
Points
113
Location
Britain
O.K. We disagree. You accuse me of doing things I haven't done by trying to tell me what I'm doing when I'm not. I've got no agenda & don't intend to do what you imply I'm doing whatsoever. You just don't understand me at all & we're speaking the same language.
 

Chris Koziarz

Masters Champion
Joined
Mar 5, 2018
Messages
928
Reactions
403
Points
63
Location
Sydney NSW
I am ridiculously wrong? So you don’t even know that w/o doesn’t count towards h-h but somehow you think you can point your finger and lecture me? Fed can have another 100 walkovers and it’d still be 15-23. What’s wrong with people these days? The clueless just talk as if they know something.

How about you remove your post? Bhahahaha
Indeed, that's me who is ridiculously wrong here. I got confused because this late WO was listed under H2H "Event breakdown" list as if it did count because it's not it marked as "non-countable' in any way. Very confusing. I didn't bother counting the number of entries in the long list hence I fell victim of the confusion. There are indeed 39 entries in the list, while the score is 15-23 as if there were 38 entries only.
I obviously apologise & I have removed my post.
 

shawnbm

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
3,573
Reactions
1,257
Points
113
Where in the internet can you watch the final? I can’t get to a television so I want to watch on phone if possible. Thanks y’all
 

shawnbm

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
3,573
Reactions
1,257
Points
113
^ Federer and Thiem already played???
 

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,552
Reactions
5,627
Points
113
Indeed, that's me who is ridiculously wrong here. I got confused because this late WO was listed under H2H "Event breakdown" list as if it did count because it's not it marked as "non-countable' in any way. Very confusing. I didn't bother counting the number of entries in the long list hence I fell victim of the confusion. There are indeed 39 entries in the list, while the score is 15-23 as if there were 38 entries only.
I obviously apologise & I have removed my post.
You are a full grown man. Deepest respect
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moxie

lob

Pro Tour Champion
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
386
Reactions
150
Points
43
what exactly happens to Roger when he tries to convert a break point?