personally I would love to see Roger play DominicIf Federer even comes close to making this a contests; what would that say about Nadal who's supposedly been playing "lights out?" I'd love to see Djokovic & Federer in the FINAL, but that's a big ask just to contest yet one more time for a Major Champ.! :whistle:
If Federer even comes close to making this a contests; what would that say about Nadal who's supposedly been playing "lights out?" I'd love to see Djokovic & Federer in the FINAL, but that's a big ask just to contest yet one more time for a Major Champ.! :whistle:
I agree with you. However, I have to add the caveat that Nadal would be expected to reach the semi finals at Wimbledon because the grass changes significantly in the second week. For Roger, I am surprised, considering that he has played on the surface for 4 years.We just marvel that Fedal playing so well at this age. Now, here is another twist to it.
1. Ralph reaches SF in Wimbledon last year.
2. Roger reaches SF in Rolland Garros this year.
They produce outstanding performances even in places where you don't expect them.
Agree. He has nothing to lose in the SF match and I'm sure he is counting on that Pressure is on Rafa and will be very interesting how this match unfolds. I am really happy to see them face once again.
lol..why would I root for a nobody like that.I like manly men.Thiem is winning nothing and he will continue to win nothing.I think in two years time I seethe likes of Shapavalov Aliassime and others winning before him .He will continue to throw hissy fits and its obvious he has beef with Serena this didnt start at this event.He talked bad about her after the USA Open.I think when Serena heard that it was him in the press room she said to herself he has to go..lol
he is not winning a slam plus RG organizers kicked him out because of his non worthy butt.
ok so she is a hormone driven donkey then, with monthly mood swings.
I might have been on Serena's side at the US Open (although it's more accurate to say I blamed the umpire more than her), but come on... Thiem was perfectly justified to criticise her there. Why you would think that implies a specific animosity from him I don't know. Serena was flat out wrong here with the interview room thing. It was flat out disrespectful and what gets me with a lot of folks is that if a man had done that to a woman there would be a thread created just to complain about it. I guarantee you this, if Roger, Rafa or Novak had suffered a bad loss, they would have had the grace and class to wait or at the very least apologise to Thiem if something like that had been attempted on their behalf. That's what gets me. If you claim Serena didn't know she should have been trying to smooth things out in the background. Clearly she didn't. I remember her coming to a bar in Wimbledon Village with her sister and having the place disrupted to accommodate her royalness. If anything I like Thiem more now, not less
