I like him a lot. He is very ambitious as well as hard worker. He will go a long way because of that.I enjoyed watching De Minaur. Good composure and enjoyable style.
I watched Kyrgios/Chardy. It was pretty good. Nick wasn't terrible, but Chardy just committed to be the steadier, and he was.2nd Round ..
7-Alex De Minaur (AUS) beat Jordan Thompson (AUS) 6-4 6-2
4-Daniil Medvedev (RUS) beat Andy Murray (GBR) 7-5 6-2
5-Milos Raonic (CAN) beat Miomir Kecmanovic (SRB) 6-3 7-6(2)
Jeremy Chardy (FRA) beat 8-Nick Kyrgios (AUS) 6-7(5) 6-2 6-3
Yasutaka Uchiyama (JPN) beat 3-Kyle Edmund (GBR) 7-6(6) 6-4
6-Grigor Dimitrov (BUL) beat John Millman (AUS) 6-3 6-4
2-Kei Nishikori (JPN) beat Denis Kudla (USA) 7-5 6-2
Poor result for Kyrgios. I thought De Minaur's ascent might spur him on a bit.
Not too surprised by Murray's loss - I think it'll take him a while to claw himself back up the ladder.
Costly loss though for Nick. Now he drops out of the top 50 as a result . And you were wondering why I am not optimistic about him.I watched Kyrgios/Chardy. It was pretty good. Nick wasn't terrible, but Chardy just committed to be the steadier, and he was.
Costly loss though for Nick. Now he drops out of the top 50 as a result . And you were wondering why I am not optimistic about him.
I will tell you why. Nick needs to improve his defensive skills. Those are average at best.
So is there any LL to replace Nad and face Tsonga? There should be according to rules. But it looks like they cannot find anyone. In which case would Tsonga receive points for his impending WO if he loses to d-minor (likely)?
He will have to do a lot of climbing to get seeded anywhere, not just at the AO.1. I agree with the modern game of baseline attrition wars, it is impossible to succeed without some level of defensive game, no matter how much offensive you can be.
2. On the other hand, it is not a big deal that he dropped points. Anyway, nowadays there are only 16 seeds and he would not be seeded even if he was able to defend his title here.
Tsonga beat De Minaur