ANYONE reading this whole thread can easily see
Appeal to majority is a logical fallacy. If most people agree with you it doesn't mean you're right.
the dumbest person here is in fact you
You're the biggest idiot I've seen on any forum.
with your claim that a supposedly superior player is better than the holder of the most slams in the open era and currently dominating the ATP tour at almost 36 years of age and miles past his prime. Last time I checked 19 > 12
In previous posts on this thread I explained why it's possible that Djokovic is a superior player.