El Dude
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 10,603
- Reactions
- 6,446
- Points
- 113
Yes, especially Becker. What I call "Early/Slow Decline" can still be quite good, but isn't quite as good as their very best years - it is "post-peak, but still prime."Even then, Edberg and Becker were still very good during their age 28 seasons. Edberg won 3 titles, had 60 match wins, and finished the year ranked #7 in 1994. Becker won 5 titles (including the Australian Open), had a 42-14 record, and finished the year ranked #6 in 1996. Their drop off didn't happen until very late in their 20s/early 30s.
Edberg dropped a notch in 1993. In truth, his best year was probably '91 (age 25) and there was a slow arc of decline after), with a clear step down in 93-94 (27-28), then another in 95-96 (29-30). He retired at 30.
Becker was elite through 96 when he was 28 for most of the year, turning 29 at the very end. He was probably at his peak in 89-90, though, when he was 21-22. Becker's last match was in 1999, when he was 31.