2023 US Open SF: Djokovic vs. Shelton

Who wins?

  • Djokovic in 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shelton in 3

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shelton in 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shelton in 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .

atttomole

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
3,347
Reactions
1,138
Points
113
Of course, we can’t have a discussion about modern greats and forget Sampras. This was a man who achieved all the records he set himself. He finished his career with twice as many slams as his nearest rival. Every single season of his peak years, he finished as the world number one. A record six seasons in succession. Tennis was different then, but Pete was always best. And you know, if he played during the years of the Big 3, he’d be as great as any of them. He was an alpha predator. He didn’t take kindly to being second best…
If he hated losing, he should have tried a bit more at RG. He lacked versatility. Great player, no doubt, but his game lacked flair.
 

Kieran

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
17,057
Reactions
7,353
Points
113
If he hated losing, he should have tried a bit more at RG. He lacked versatility. Great player, no doubt, but his game lacked flair.
The game was different then. To win all four slams now is more accessible to great players than it was. As for flair, that’s a meaningless attribute that has nothing to do with greatness. Pete had the most economic, point-breaking game imaginable…
 
  • Like
Reactions: AnonymousFan

atttomole

Multiple Major Winner
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
3,347
Reactions
1,138
Points
113
The game was different then. To win all four slams now is more accessible to great players than it was. As for flair, that’s a meaningless attribute that has nothing to do with greatness. Pete had the most economic, point-breaking game imaginable…
Can you elaborate on all four slams being more accessible?