They change it, so no meeting this week. Rune will play against Andy Murray insteadThey will meet this week.....
They change it, so no meeting this week. Rune will play against Andy Murray insteadThey will meet this week.....
Listen, I mentioned Charley and Hewitt in the same sentence several months ago when he blew up at the USO. I said it’s possible that Alcaraz is like Hewitt as an interim champ of a few slams. But you’re talking up Tiafoe very confidently based upon little or nothing, so using that same criteria you ought to be very confident about Alcaraz, who actually is a champion, no?I'm not saying Alcaraz isn't going to win anything again (if you ask me right now, I would say he will win several more slams), but you just never know. Nothing is ever guaranteed in tennis, and things have a funny way of changing drastically in such short order. If you don't believe me, look at how the career trajectories of Hewitt and Federer changed between Wimbledon 2002 and the end of 2004. I'm not saying that will happen with Alcaraz and Rune, but it can certainly happen.
The one thing i hear often others say about 20/21 year olds is that they have plenty of time.
Yes and No. IMO it’s never too early.
You take your opportunity when it presents itself. That may be your best shot ever.
In hindsight, Ask Michael Chang, Andy Roddick, Carlos Moya, & Juan Martin Del Potro if they won too young.
It won't change his status as an all time great, but we can't really answer final career numbers. No one knows how winning that MP point would have changed the course of a player's schedule and thus their future results. It's all hypotheticalGREAT series by Steve Tiger on Tennis.com called: GOAT Race is our 10-part look back at the times when the Grand Slam title chase might have gone a different way. It recalls how, but for one or two shots, a slam would have gone in the other direction. Some might label it "woulda coulda", but I think it underscores that the GOAT among the three recent greats is a bit arbitrary given how close many matches were. As I've said before, if Roger had made on of those match points in Wimbledon '19, would that really change his status as a great? I don't think so.......
Da GOAT Nadal is there..I hope he add Feli to his staffingWatching Feli Lopez match at the Mallorca Tournament his last tournament before he finally retires
Rafa, his wife Mery and Toni Nadal, Carlos Moyer are there watching as well.
Feli playing Aussie Max Purcell, Feli won 1st set 64, 5 all 2nd set
Feli broke serve with a great lob and will serve for the match 6-5
Feli wins to play another day 64 75!
Well in the case I've cited it was a final so it wouldn't have changed anyone's schedule. But the more important thing is---I don't think one or two shots changes anyone's status as a great. Of course it's all hypothetical---if you read the article--that's the entire pointIt won't change his status as an all time great, but we can't really answer final career numbers. No one knows how winning that MP point would have changed the course of a player's schedule and thus their future results. It's all hypothetical
Well, their resumes become fixed, so not AS relevant, but hell, we still talk about all of those guys around here.Not bleak, but realistic.
When players retire it is the end of an era and they are no longer as relevant. It happened to Pancho Gonzalez, it happened to Laver, to Borg, it happened to Sampras and it just happened to Federer. And it will happen sooner than later to Nadal & Djokovic.
I get your point, but it's going to take a long time to fade, IMO.Of course the era of Alcaraz/Rune & company will be exciting in its own way. My response was a reaction to Fiero complaining that Fedalovic takes up all the air in tennis discussions. Its been an exceptionally long run but its simply the nature of sports talk that it *will* fade.
Didn’t we say the same thing about Pistol Pete? ; )Well, their resumes become fixed, so not AS relevant, but hell, we still talk about all of those guys around here.
I get your point, but it's going to take a long time to fade, IMO.
Yes, but we still talk about him.Didn’t we say the same thing about Pistol Pete? ; )
I'm sorry if I'm being obtuse about your point...it's not deliberate. Is it that GOAT debate for the next ones, is too soon? Or that they can get there, if there's just one? Or that we're going to stop talking about the Big 3 as soon as they retire? Again, I'm sorry that I'm missing the point.All im saying is if ONE great champhion instead of three per the current era emerges, someone else getting 20+ slams is plausible.
And of course IIRC Federer was just 5 or 6 slams into his Slam career when the GOAT buzz started around him…