Everyone is labeling Kyrgios a villain in this tournament (especially native Wimby commentators) and hardly anyone is praising his high level of play (except maybe few down under fellows here, including myself) what's wrong with you people who concentrate on bad things only? Nick is a bad boy, as he has and will always be. He will be using bad language & arguing with umps all the time. That's his problem we know that, we've been rehearsing that so many times. And Nick will not improve his temper if we keep punching him for it. Maybe praise him instead, that despite bad feelings, he didn't melt but held on and won!
In the context of the whole match with Tsi: who of the two were "worse" evil and deserves more condemnation? The only bad thing Kyrgios did was threatening the officials he won't play if they do not default Tsi. That was bullying at the officials, not at Tsi who took it personally due to his weak mind.
On the other hand, Tsi did:
- hit the ball at the spectator,
- then at the score screen,
- then later admitted to smash at the "bully"
So 3:1 for Tsi in this infamous "unsportsman;s game". Yet all criticism concentrates on Kyrgios and pretty much not a word on Tsi... Again, what's wrong with you people? Because Tsi was a subject of alleged "bullying"? Wake up people, and see the forest on Tsi rather than just a single tree on Kyrgios! I'm waiting what penalties organisers are going to announce on both. Will they see it objectively and impose at least 3 times more penalties on Tsi per the above (should be more for physical danger of hitting the spectator)? Or, sadly, are they going to parrot the ignorant journalists who are used to Kyrgios being the poster boy of bad behaviour?