idiot I don't have an idol, I don't need one to appreciate the game. as expected you need to self-compliment your comment about Kyrgios...….spot on where and how? Oh he is limited, who isn't? every player is limited one way or another. If all these pros appreciate his talent/ability, I think something is special. has anyone important ever praised your ability? or anyone praised your boldness, fat belly or short legs? don't think fat potatos like you get much compliments...
you are a self-entitled idiot who think Nick isn't special when people around him says otherwise, and that is very indicative of the usual type around here...….bold, short and fat man talking shit.
Nick is blunt but he doesn't make it up, which says a lot about you. As a matter of fact a coach I see every week grew up in the same age group. If he was lying, all the players around him would know. Now who is full of shit BS?
yes players spend time together, share the gym and they know each other's schedule and practice courts etc.....if you ever know someone who is in the business, you would know all that. Now it's obvious you don't know crap, just shut up and learn. If all else fails, google it and you wouldn't spill shit like you have.
yeah I am a moron for saying he is special, so is his peers from same age group, so is JMac (who actively tries to be involved with Nick), so is Rafa who keeps saying Nick is top talent (without someone asking him), so is Federer who invites many times for Nick to train with him, so is FAA who publicly made it clear he wants nothing to do with Nick....the list goes on. I don't have the patience or appetite to argue with empty head like you, you know absolutely nothing and sure you can always look up 'results' which everyone can, which I am sure those experts are also aware of, but that won't change the fact you are still clueless.
Too bad that they have youtube in Austria but not Switzerland, I guess, huh? Or that Roger had to play Rafa in his salad years, and Thiem gets him on the rougher side of his career. All credit to Thiem for that win, for sure. But any notion that Roger lost so many RG finals to Rafa just because he couldn't figure out his strategy is bollocks. Federer didn't have a strategy problem at RG, he had a Rafa problem.
so you have evidence that Nick is a liar? see that's the problem, you don't know shit about Nick but continues to fart out of nothing. yeah Nick just pretends he doesn't train, during tournaments.....bla bla bla, just listen to yourself idiot.
show me one 'insight' you have about Nick, apart from the bs of your self-entitled opinion. With these guys' status, they'd just go down on Nick and made up all those praises about him while you are the one with 'insight'. And yeah the big 3 just happen to lose or struggle against Nick, who is really not special and must have them on his payroll. They play him soft so they can bump up his bragging rights. All evidence suggest one thing about you, that you are a worthless idiot.
lack of ability to hit rally forehand? huh? his rally forehands are very heavy balls with huge margin for errors, which push most players back and they can't get clean hits. Backhand? you fukn idiot, his bh is more consistent than you can see with your delusions, as unorthodox as it looks. He was able to use it in long rallies against Simon point in and point out, when he decided and needed to be solid. You don't beat Simon by being hit and miss.
