Jelenafan
Multiple Major Winner
There is NO fair solution to the ratings Clusterf**k due to COVID. NONE.
Top 3::
Didn't Djokovic accumulate the most points in the year, regardless? He won 1 Major, reached the finals of another, and won 2 Masters. So I can't dispute he's the year's #1 player even if admittedly this is an asterisk * year. Of the top 3 players he's the only one who enter the 3 Majors that were played. However... it sucks that he wasn't challenged more, because I am not one of those who think he would have won Wimbledon automatically. Even the USO, both Rafa and Feds were missing and he still screwed that one up.
Rafa won 1 Major, reached the Qtrs of another and skipped the USO as defending champion. However in the midst of a pandemic the ATP understandably didn't want to penalize players for their safety protocols. The tour HC TO calycourt transition was unprecedented because of the revamped rescheduling. However, In hindsight, Rafa's choice was probably the best for him, his FO prep would have not have been ideal ; as none of the semifinalists of the USO reached that far at the French Open it sort of proved his point. Theim who I thought was the greatest threat at Roland Garos was spent by the time they played Paris, as was Zverev. Novak probably did as well as he did at the FO because he was defaulted at the USO and exited early.
Not Federer's fault, but let's be real , out of everyone he got the MOST benefit of the computer rankings decision because not playing for 13 MONTHS and counting, he will still be in the top 10. You don't play for a friggin year and there is virtually no change to you ranking. Fed not playing had absolutely nothing to do with the COVID but because he had injury issues. Again, he didn't create the COVID though I suspect some of his uberfans had something to do with it......
Agan NOBODY could have figured out an equitable solution, hell, we bitch about the computer rankings even when all the tournaments are played...
Top 3::
Didn't Djokovic accumulate the most points in the year, regardless? He won 1 Major, reached the finals of another, and won 2 Masters. So I can't dispute he's the year's #1 player even if admittedly this is an asterisk * year. Of the top 3 players he's the only one who enter the 3 Majors that were played. However... it sucks that he wasn't challenged more, because I am not one of those who think he would have won Wimbledon automatically. Even the USO, both Rafa and Feds were missing and he still screwed that one up.
Rafa won 1 Major, reached the Qtrs of another and skipped the USO as defending champion. However in the midst of a pandemic the ATP understandably didn't want to penalize players for their safety protocols. The tour HC TO calycourt transition was unprecedented because of the revamped rescheduling. However, In hindsight, Rafa's choice was probably the best for him, his FO prep would have not have been ideal ; as none of the semifinalists of the USO reached that far at the French Open it sort of proved his point. Theim who I thought was the greatest threat at Roland Garos was spent by the time they played Paris, as was Zverev. Novak probably did as well as he did at the FO because he was defaulted at the USO and exited early.
Not Federer's fault, but let's be real , out of everyone he got the MOST benefit of the computer rankings decision because not playing for 13 MONTHS and counting, he will still be in the top 10. You don't play for a friggin year and there is virtually no change to you ranking. Fed not playing had absolutely nothing to do with the COVID but because he had injury issues. Again, he didn't create the COVID though I suspect some of his uberfans had something to do with it......
Agan NOBODY could have figured out an equitable solution, hell, we bitch about the computer rankings even when all the tournaments are played...