Murat Baslamisli
The GOAT
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2013
- Messages
- 10,337
- Reactions
- 1,055
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 52
- Location
- Aurora, Ontario, Canada
- Website
- www.drummershangout.ca
No worries, I know what you mean. I am just looking at it from a different perspective. "Almost" like winning a single year grand slam. A very rare feat, no? And you may not have to be "efficient" throughout the year to win a single year grand slam. You may win 6 Masters1000s and a bunch of other tournaments and even be the year end number one. That's darn efficient. But you still have not won 4 slams in a year because for one reason or the other, it is darn tough! Pete could not do it , ditto for Roger, Rafa , Nole, etc...It may or may not make you the best player in the game that year, but it does put you in a very special spot that might warrant consideration for an award like MVP.We will agree to disagree there. Scoring efficiency is an enormous piece of the NBA puzzle. That is why we would easily put guys like LeBron, Durant, Curry and Harden over Westbrook. Don't get me wrong, Russ is a great player because of everything he does. It goes without saying he doesn't have to score well to have a positive impact on the game. But even with a legit MVP candidate on his team in Paul George the team hasn't exactly been world beaters this year or last year for that matter.
I have a feeling you're seeing games like 25,12,14 on 23 shots and rating that over someone doing something like 30, 5, 5 on 18 shots. If I don't know anything else I'm taking the latter in a heartbeat. But I pound the table hard on scoring efficiency, it's huge in the current NBA. And it only gets tougher in the playoffs