- Joined
- Jul 14, 2015
- Messages
- 2,256
- Reactions
- 930
- Points
- 113
AnonymousFan said:Who wins?
Fiero425 said:The H2H with Nole was heavily in his favor as well, but Stan turned it around a few years ago, actually beating his rival in all 3 of his major wins; 2 in the final! Stan has got to get over his "bugaboo" playing his countryman; having a lot more game the last few years! On paper; Roger in a walk, but Stan's not the same player! I think he'll rise to the occasion! :angel: :dodgy: :clap
isabelle said:could the "young" Swiss beat the 'old" Swiss ??i hope so but he has to play well all match long, no stupid errors please Stan !!!
shivashish said:Looks like a sort of tough match for Roger on the cards. But that does not mean, he will necessarily let Stan have it easy! He is going to serve well for sure. Can't see him having a bad day after some good matches. And, if he is at his best, he should win in straights or 4 sets. A lot depends on the first few games. Stan can possibly come out bashing the ball. That can make the first set difficult for Roger. Barring that, Roger should get this done at least.
I hope Roger gets to the final. Bel18ve.
19USC66 said:Roger will lose. Does not want to meet Nadal in the final.
Fiero425 said:The H2H with Nole was heavily in his favor as well, but Stan turned it around a few years ago, actually beating his rival in all 3 of his major wins; 2 in the final! Stan has got to get over his "bugaboo" playing his countryman; having a lot more game the last few years! On paper; Roger in a walk, but Stan's not the same player! I think he'll rise to the occasion! :angel: :dodgy: :clap
isabelle said:just hope awful Mirka'll shut up...Stan should have some ear plugs in his bag...in case of....hope Stan can win that and win AO in the process, good luck Stan
Front242 said:Stan is a pr1ck anyway. How many opponents has he belted the ball at on purpose last few weeks?! Dirty scumbag.
mightyjeditribble said:Front242 said:Stan is a pr1ck anyway. How many opponents has he belted the ball at on purpose last few weeks?! Dirty scumbag.
Is there any evidence of this? I know there was the one incident against Klizan in the fifth, but I'm not aware of any pattern.
And there's a fine line. Generally someone at the net would be considered a legitimate target; in doubles I think it is a standard play to hit at them. Of course it is usually considered bad form when there are other options, and shouldn't be done with an intention of actually hurting them. I think the shot in the Klizan match, given the score at the time, can be considered as Stan just wanting to make sure of the point. I think it was Greg Rusedski who pretty much said as much afterwards, saying he would go down the middle too.
All that being said, certainly Stan shouldn't be such a crybaby if he gets heckled. :laydownlaughing
Front242 said:Stan doesn't deserve to have beaten Klizan. He couldn't play after that hard ball in the nuts and lost the next 2 games promptly.