DarthFed said:Obsi said:DarthFed said:Everyone's definition is different. He will likely retire well before that happens. Dropping out of the top 10 means he is either injured for most of a year or 40 years old. Comparing someone who used to win 95% of their matches and get to every single GS semi and nearly every final to the Roger of today is serious decline. The guy is that talented that even as a fraction of himself he is still one of the best as he approaches 35. Respect the talent or let the hate consume you
You overestimate Federer. Saying he is in serious decline despite being No. 3 is just laughable...
Number 3 behind Murray... Not an overestimation of a serious decline at all. Who the hell else would be #3 given the state of Nadal?