2015 Wimbledon Final: Djokovic v. Federer II

Make your choices


  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .

Front242

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
23,009
Reactions
3,953
Points
113
pretty sure everyone knows who they are anyway :D
 

Kirijax

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
6,220
Reactions
4
Points
0
Age
60
Location
Kirishima, Japan
This might be the oldest Wimbledon ever. Fed 33, Serena 33, Hingis 34, Rojer 33, Paes 35. 33 is te new 17. lol
 

tented

Administrator
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
21,703
Reactions
10,580
Points
113
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
That probably is an all-around record, Kirijax. Im certain it is with Serena (at least in the Open Era).
 

Sundaymorningguy

Grand Slam Champion
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
6,387
Reactions
1,762
Points
113
Location
Norfolk, VA
Well I think the French is different from Wimbledon in that he has two, so I think he will be much less stressed here
 

Federberg

The GOAT
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Messages
15,644
Reactions
5,730
Points
113
already spitting with rain here, but Im about 20 miles away from the action
 

Backhand_DTL

Pro Tour Player
Joined
Jun 9, 2014
Messages
269
Reactions
41
Points
18
GameSetAndMath said:
-FG- said:
johnsteinbeck said:
Uhm, kinda weird that my seeding sidenote would lead someone to claim that he's a guaranteed #2 (hehe, number two...)
Again: with that mass of grass points, Fed could well be helped in the seeding next year. if that makes the difference between #3 and #2 or being unseeded and #25? That depends on what he does from Monday on.


That said, one could actually probably calculate a guaranteed (or at least highly likely) seeding range (for Novak as well), because the points could well be enough to get a seeded position, even if they don't enter a tournament for a year after monday.
The formula is just used to adjust the seeded players. So if someone is not among the Top 32 entered for the event when the draw is made, he has no chance to get a seeding regardless of grass points. This year for example Kohlschreiber would have been seeded instead of I think Thiem if the formula was used for everyone.

You are correct. However, points earned in Wimbledon this year will come down only after the end of Wimbledon next year. So, even if Fed stops playing completely after this Wimbledon, he will have a ranking points of 1200 in his account when they determine the seedings. That 1200 is typically good enough to ensure that you are in top 32 of rankings charts and so he will be eligible for seeding boost by addition.
Of course it's basically impossible, that Federer will be outside of the seeded players then. I just wanted to clarify that the additional points from the formula can never make the difference between being seeded or unseeded.