Of course it's basically impossible, that Federer will be outside of the seeded players then. I just wanted to clarify that the additional points from the formula can never make the difference between being seeded or unseeded.GameSetAndMath said:-FG- said:The formula is just used to adjust the seeded players. So if someone is not among the Top 32 entered for the event when the draw is made, he has no chance to get a seeding regardless of grass points. This year for example Kohlschreiber would have been seeded instead of I think Thiem if the formula was used for everyone.johnsteinbeck said:Uhm, kinda weird that my seeding sidenote would lead someone to claim that he's a guaranteed #2 (hehe, number two...)
Again: with that mass of grass points, Fed could well be helped in the seeding next year. if that makes the difference between #3 and #2 or being unseeded and #25? That depends on what he does from Monday on.
That said, one could actually probably calculate a guaranteed (or at least highly likely) seeding range (for Novak as well), because the points could well be enough to get a seeded position, even if they don't enter a tournament for a year after monday.
You are correct. However, points earned in Wimbledon this year will come down only after the end of Wimbledon next year. So, even if Fed stops playing completely after this Wimbledon, he will have a ranking points of 1200 in his account when they determine the seedings. That 1200 is typically good enough to ensure that you are in top 32 of rankings charts and so he will be eligible for seeding boost by addition.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wimbledon Review 2015 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 4 | ||
Tennis Frontier Commentates the 2015 Wimbledon Finals | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 37 | ||
2015 Wimbledon Semifinal: Djokovic v. Gasquet | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 535 | ||
2015 Wimbledon Semifinal: Federer v. Murray | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 607 | ||
Upset Corner - Wimbledon 2015 Edition | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 66 |