13382 said:
There is a lot of grey area here
@mikeone and
@claydeath… it isn’t a binary equation. I don’t see prime Novak edging prime Nadal on clay. Never did frankly. We can talk about mental issues and forage for reasons why Novak lost a match… but he lost them, end of. The mental side is part and parcel of what makes great players great. Is Novak a match-up issue for Nadal? Most definitely. Is it one Nadal has been able to overcome on clay… yes. The proof is in the pudding. I’d hazard a guess that if you asked Novak what his toughest assignment was.. the answer would be Nadal on clay. Federer might worry him more on other surfaces, but beating Nadal on clay would still be the toughest assignment out there.
I'm a big Rafa fan, always have been but i also like Novak. What i try to avoid is being biased between he two. I can't deny i'm a little biased against Federer but even with him, i have tried to not get carried away by my biases.
When it comes to Rafa, there are a few myths to dispel. The first one is that he was at his best on clay between 05-08. The reason his most ardent fans argue this is because during that period, he only lost a few matches and had that 81 match win streak. For sure we can't ignore actual results but unfortunately, we have to not just look at hard facts and get into some subjective discussions. Nadal during 05-08 was absolutely dominant on clay but he hadn't yet reached his prime. Nadal's prime, IMO, was between 08-13. Nadal's best years, without any doubt, are 2008, 2010 and 2013. There isn't any doubt about this at all, period. To argue that Rafa somehow improved his all around game between 08-13 but became mysteriously worse on clay, is quite frankly a bit stupid. Yes he had that 81 match win streak and yes he looked unbeatable but he simply wasn't as good all around as he was between 08-13. The fact that he didn't go on a 80 match clay win streak during 08-13 means little to me, it just means that type of streak is almost impossible to repeat, especially mentally. Between 05-08 Rafael was pedestrian on hard courts, getting beat by nobodies and he really didn't have much of chance outside of clay, on big tournaments. Between 08-13 he became a MAJOR THREAT, on ANY SURFACE and piled up hard courts slams and masters like he never did during 05-08; not to mention, he continued to dominate clay, although to a lesser degree for good reasons. The first reason is that his competition got stiffer. Once Novak got it together physically and mentally, he has beaten Rafa 6 times on clay. 2015 aside (because for sure Rafa was below his best on all surfaces), Novak beat prime Nadal on clay, more than a few times. In 2011, he straight setted Rafa in 2 clay court masters and continued to beat him over the years, although Rafa also beat him. Rafa's level on clay between 11-13 was the same as it was during 05-08, he just had to contend with a player who really does present a nightmare match-up against him. The other reason Rafa didn't focus on 80 match win streaks on clay is because he was doing MUCH BETTER ON other surfaces. It doesn't mean he wasn't as good on clay, it just means he paced himself better, in order to compete on other surfaces. What was Rafael doing outside of clay when he had that 80 match win streak? getting destroyed by guys like Youhzny, Tsonga, Ferrer on hardcourt slams, embarrassing really. Since he was so pedestrian outside of clay, Rafael's strategy was to absolutely sweep clay events, to amass points. During 08-13, Rafa was actually winning AO, USO, Wimbledon and many more hardcourt masters. He didn't need to win 80 matches on clay to stay at #2 or attain #1! Frankly, if he had won 80 matches in a row i don't think he would've been able to be so successful outside of clay, this is too taxing mentally and physically. I have no doubt that Rafa's level on 2010, 2011 and 2013 was better than between 05-08, he was a BETTER PLAYER, end of discussion.
Now, about Nole vs Rafa on clay. Let's look at prime Rafa vs prime Nole on clay:
2011 - Novak straight sets prime Rafa easily at Monte carlo and rome.
2012 - Nadal beats Novak at MC, Rome and FO
2013 - Novak beats Rafa at MC, Rafa beats him at FO
2014 - Novak beats Rafa at Rome, Rafa beats him at FO
so prime Rafa vs prime Novak on clay - 5-4 Rafa, very tight. Now, it's important to note that Rafa went 3-0 at Roland but to be honest, the match where both seemed at their very best was 2013. This match pretty much shows what happens when both are at their very best, pretty much a toss up. Nole was up a break in 5th set and Rafa had to play a level even considered above him to beat Novak, and he needed a bit of help from Novak. In the 5th set, Rafa went all out with his fh and produced winner after winner, against a supreme defender, it was 9-7! So both at their very very best on clay, the match can go either way, perhaps the slights edge to Rafa as Novak's game has less margin. Now what people need to stop saying is that i'm arguing Novak is better than Rafa on clay, this is silly (9 FO vs 0) but the point is the match-up problems. Novak, is an amazing clay court player with the perfect game to beat Rafa; he's not better than Rafa on clay against everyone else but head to head, he is right there...