- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 16,915
- Reactions
- 6,648
- Points
- 113
here's an interesting thought.. I've heard some pundits in recent years talk about Jokic eventually securing a higher all time ranking than the likes of Steph and Hakeem. This series against the Wolves is pretty much making it clear that the Nuggets window might already be closed... and this is coming from someone who before the playoffs started actually thought (assuming AG, and Watson would be fit) that the Nuggets might be the sneaky winners of it all this year.
To me, the discussion about where Jokic lands all time highlights the difference between better and greater. I don't think he's greater than either Steph or Hakeem, but it's possible he's better than Steph, or at least on par. I don't think he touches Hakeem though.. possibly the best defender of all time (Wemby will of course usurp him), an all time leader, and decent offensive player too. A player so good that no one has ever made an issue of the fact he was the no 1 pick in MJ's draft. I would be fascinated to see someone make that distinction, better vs greater, with all time ranks. That would be a fun discussion
To me, the discussion about where Jokic lands all time highlights the difference between better and greater. I don't think he's greater than either Steph or Hakeem, but it's possible he's better than Steph, or at least on par. I don't think he touches Hakeem though.. possibly the best defender of all time (Wemby will of course usurp him), an all time leader, and decent offensive player too. A player so good that no one has ever made an issue of the fact he was the no 1 pick in MJ's draft. I would be fascinated to see someone make that distinction, better vs greater, with all time ranks. That would be a fun discussion