Have a great time.About to leave for NYC for work and sneak off to Flushing Meadows on Friday. Hoping to see some of my faves![]()
Nasal is a golfer. Roger was a manufactured friend via IMG.
But they also did a Gillette spot together. I thought they had the same management, but maybe I made that up.Wasn't it the Nike connection?
But they also did a Gillette spot together. I thought they had the same management, but maybe I made that up.![]()
No. In R3 he plays Khachanov.
K has no chances of beating Rafa. K is a violent ball bashers that is too erratic. But, K will surely have some brilliant moments.
Khach more ballbasher than Paire? B-)Yeah I do think Khach has very limited upside, he's a total ballbasher. Fun to watch but the peasant will get enough balls back to win comfortably. Hopefully he moves Nads around a lot though.
Khach more ballbasher than Paire? B-)
That misses some context. First both Djokovic and Nadal are more than 5 years younger than Roger. On top of that the sea change from the pre-topspin to the topspin era gives the younger two an edge, they grew up in it. Djoker is certainly no 'ally' of Roger. He snatched 3 slam finals and 4(?) SFs. So his absence would have put Roger at at least 24. So even assuming Nadal got extra slams without Djkovic he'd be chasing a bigger target. Another hidden assumption is that Nadal would have won all those matches he lost to Djokovic, had it been *anyone* else. Not sure. Best example is Stan. He won AO 2014, we all thought it was a gimme for Nadal. Whoever gets to a GS F/SF will not be easy to take out.After owning Roger for most of their careers, it appears it's been Djokovic that has been the GOAT's best ally keeping Nadal's resume in check so far! He's eaten into a lot of majors and clay events Rafa could have inflated his record with! Roger should be rather thankful because things might have been very different but for our savior of tennis history, NOLE! :whistle:![]()
![]()
![]()
That misses some context. First both Djokovic and Nadal are more than 5 years younger than Roger. On top of that the sea change from the pre-topspin to the topspin era gives the younger two an edge, they grew up in it. Djoker is certainly no 'ally' of Roger. He snatched 3 slam finals and 4(?) SFs. So his absence would have put Roger at at least 24. So even assuming Nadal got extra slams without Djkovic he'd be chasing a bigger target. Another hidden assumption is that Nadal would have won all those matches he lost to Djokovic, had it been *anyone* else. Not sure. Best example is Stan. He won AO 2014, we all thought it was a gimme for Nadal. Whoever gets to a GS F/SF will not be easy to take out.
Sent from my 6045O using Tapatalk
So the assumption Roger would have at least 24 isn’t a gimmee either, following that logic.
Nole has lost something like 8-10 finals/SF to both Roger and Nadal. Doubt he considers himself in his place in history as a “ spoiler”.
What is more likely at this point is that while Roger is nearing the end of his competitive days, Rafa and Nole *may* have anywhere from 2-4 or even more years to battle for Majors. Their final tally may be far from over, thus Nobody should be looked upon merely as a placeholder for another to ensure or protect their current lead.
Wouldn’t be shocked if both Rafa and Nole end up with 20 plus Majors.
Kyrgios unfortunately woke up after sleeping through the first set and a half. I am hoping he has to play five sets.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
BMW Open 2018, Munich, Germany, ATP 250 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 53 | |
![]() |
Erste Bank Open 2018, Vienna, ATP 500 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 53 | |
![]() |
China Open 2018, Beijing, China, ATP 500 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 48 | |
![]() |
Chengdu Open 2018 - China - ATP 250 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 34 | |
![]() |
Shenzhen Open 2018, China - ATP 250 | Pro Tennis (Mens) | 23 |